Re: [Ianaplan] [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 22 June 2015 03:03 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EDB1AC3D9 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 20:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.563
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76KDrwO6rth0 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 20:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190BA1AC3D8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 20:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15669 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2015 03:03:12 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-id:user-agent; s=3d34.55877af0.k1506; bh=46ypbYel9aabiAiOTrMWtV4g75Y/K2CnT57gioz7iHE=; b=Ps/a0P3q9qa8igzR/hoWhUHBaWp/tyTP3N2SA75nrBHSTz0B7Px6kBkjsgf1+/8hA5mF6kPuLNnGrGrmLRDWtBYOSW4ZbJ7C+NTuDlewrgg+PvIsSmYl1mWqcloWawN76bO7qQPk1bF/cf5WhUmAvAhawmpBDpg4/iBoBZf6pYlZzpDZJUGbW2esmZOLs2GJMVyTk7WvCHxeT0YyWa02HR0GWRAEvk3Aty0MQZYsbRAWXhTLsUAwIjfZnjC/3ueX
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-id:user-agent; s=3d34.55877af0.k1506; bh=46ypbYel9aabiAiOTrMWtV4g75Y/K2CnT57gioz7iHE=; b=lKy00QqgcKtwyaTxS8gR61UccKMaY7ta2xO7W/Ie19bXyu0gWNS7i8WWeJE626IoC/sgiqDtvWVkefpdmNVYJ4m8IDoRHHtFO+hl8qL5w4mcEC7iLNpBcJFMvyjawI7HsktN/HJNXR5N//p+YYztXiAWYJ0faISPn57L6oBw2MUPu2e/id96KfN8vuLy7039TZPYqcuHIvOgq8OAEWTwPwZmFf15maA0YiWRBd/EtSNBhUQqhbUnFSdt1S2/dXIn
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 22 Jun 2015 03:03:12 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:02:59 -0300
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506212359520.50387@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <6E44AECD-B507-467D-B023-33C83F2B4DB6@istaff.org>
References: <20150621143800.85362.qmail@ary.lan> <6E44AECD-B507-467D-B023-33C83F2B4DB6@istaff.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-851211618-1434942111=:50387"
Content-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506220002210.50387@ary.local>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/05OTDZ9e4_LvYgnBHaubbk-Zy4M>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 03:03:04 -0000

> There are registries of values.   There are “IANA" registries of values.

Right. ICANN runs them all, and has trademark registrations in relevant 
areas.  I presume you have read the registrations at the USPTO.

Fortunately, we have at least a year and probably two before anything will 
change, so there's no point in having this argument until the names crowd 
get their act together.

R's,
John