Re: [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN

'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 30 April 2015 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01A71B2CE9 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id odlMnIbQh35r for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED79E1B2CE1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6F9106B1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:41:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3L8vdnljLX7T for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:41:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [85.159.94.18]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8957310636 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:41:33 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:41:31 +0100
From: 'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150430154131.GJ65861@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20150430115751.GE65715@mx2.yitter.info> <00c401d08358$a715f860$f541e920$@ch> <20150430153008.GH65861@mx2.yitter.info> <00c701d0835b$1aeb1160$50c13420$@ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00c701d0835b$1aeb1160$50c13420$@ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/0e8HuxmRgGJC5y9RIFnsMr2bL-0>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Update on IANA Transition & Negotiations with ICANN
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:41:37 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:34:09PM +0200, Richard Hill wrote:
> Do you know whether ICANN would have any objections if the new language only
> enters into force if and when the current contract with NTIA is no longer in
> force?

I do not.  I would be completely unsurprised if they were
contemplating that question, but I do not know their position.

Best regards,

A (speaking for myself)

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com