IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IPR Memo

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 05 August 2015 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0381A9148 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHYmyitRbnAl for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F9A1A905B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C68DBE8A; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:07:07 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXPS0x_RZaVq; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:07:06 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.42.29.233]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2222BBE4C; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:07:06 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1438801626; bh=8J8wlQ/iaDmhMDj5SxvZfLQl4y/Xtt5OEs11lXPDmcg=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=0zVozg0Zz/RR+9igIExtnFtowsraoJpQUqQHynOOyGdvEQ5UIXtphJakVfVcwxef0 TkRYnzBKAnUaQlsZ+qBSCWLeiK+8kH1dPu77+XR791Hd5/mbjUeoE7Ia+NDOQmMjQg fvnffvrBqRgbXL6GQg4zfp6g0uc1dOwVgWZFz3O4=
Message-ID: <55C25ED9.9000809@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:07:05 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <20150805185609.10615.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20150805185609.10615.qmail@ary.lan>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/0kYgHHkvthxsQDeFGNX5zoooKwI>
Cc: seun.ojedeji@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IPR Memo
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 19:07:18 -0000


On 05/08/15 19:56, John Levine wrote:
>> Even though this community has submitted her proposal, I thought this CWG
>> legal document on IANA trademark/domain could be of interest as the 3
>> communities tries to determine way forward on this subject matter.
> 
> I have to say this document appears to have started with the
> conclusion that ICANN should keep the IANA IPR (domain, trademark,
> etc.) and worked backwards to find justifications.
> 
> Much of what it says appears to my semi-lawyerly eye to be just wrong.
> But I wouldn't suggest making a stink about it, since at this point
> it's far from clear who's really going to be pushing for what
> outcomes.

Yeah, it struck me that entirely omitting the history of the DNS
name, (sorry "IPR") also seemed a teeny bit incomplete;-)

S

> 
> R's,
> John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email