Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 22 June 2015 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C87F1A871B for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.563
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RRVmCpK-S443 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166181A8ABF for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 06:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3894 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2015 13:36:19 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=f35.55880f53.k1506; bh=y6cVAZa/wXgYGZ4uUO9lm3rCclMWpQeAjg6py7WtzuU=; b=amPFncZeKc+PqyhQfWBo7H/7vlEdhKXNFqy/WHffxYd+ZMThvjJoc5OJmbXYbxldWT5Tyc05NGYOxiTNnZNwg2Hh/Ip9JT6+woicIgUQC67YhXhllt5dddZiFnf1uE6X/7HTyjTn+uvkkGnE7ueJIT56zNEJ24j2M+TLb81x840RvBopDVi6Fs75zvynD9d9xiYqvMTlHlRm73ZNE4QIsy8FHxo9YZyaZP9qxWD5kJQQ6pAmxqLLlMMwjYfp4thG
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=f35.55880f53.k1506; bh=y6cVAZa/wXgYGZ4uUO9lm3rCclMWpQeAjg6py7WtzuU=; b=Ls3EtfIzwjjbHIzjDd+94gUD4XultNDHEIQ8AzRBa/wHcEwCpQDim99ouOzvijJSjsx6FHbBG8pUNsLGOcFTJ4V1mMfrWDN9Q7xFLhDUCOk4e1ofz724c5tSpgzi7Z2twopYEbBuwpRvrdHie0CYrBLNZOYXFDRzBEl/MDaMZpAx9LXWg9Azjo/iIKf6E25AgZxTICaMEgZSNT+m7J03j1BtI7sWpOuzuunzP460vfaTQAmM+A/H1Avto/9bjvLm
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 22 Jun 2015 13:36:18 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:36:05 -0300
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506221032250.50421@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5587A015.9030700@cisco.com>
References: <20150619170708.84611.qmail@ary.lan> <3F18936E1587B5F2BB89E800@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <55847BE9.9040507@gmail.com> <5584BC64.7060403@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506192151170.47260@ary.local> <5584D664.90003@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506201928040.47864@ary.local> <55863ABF.8020903@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211008240.48224@ary.local> <5586EB11.5030404@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211400250.48860@ary.local> <5587A015.9030700@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/0yBfqNWX6kDEmIW2uCt-U7cnuFY>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:36:19 -0000

> If we were to put the legal questions aside, I imagine we would all
> argue that of course the IETF should be able to continue to use the name
> IANA no matter who the IFO was.  Would you agree with that statement?

Of course.  But it makes no sense to put the legal questions aside.  If 
the future IANA continues to be reasonable, which we all hope and expect 
it will, things will work fine and it doesn't matter who holds the 
trademark and domain.  If things get nasty, it stil doesn't matter, we're 
schrod no matter who holds the trademark and domain.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.