Re: [Ianaplan] [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

manning <bmanning@karoshi.com> Mon, 22 June 2015 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C39D1B2E06 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iPSWamdTfJMc for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12A31B2E02 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875239C3D08; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at karoshi.com
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vacation.karoshi.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hlb01sJ3OqW8; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.58.50] (unknown [190.210.61.153]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D7139C3CFA; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: manning <bmanning@karoshi.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506212359520.50387@ary.local>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 01:08:31 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1CB9159A-54D0-4134-A5F9-F57B3F4CF0E0@karoshi.com>
References: <20150621143800.85362.qmail@ary.lan> <6E44AECD-B507-467D-B023-33C83F2B4DB6@istaff.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506212359520.50387@ary.local>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/1PM09Se4ZB9ZR6meyEGZO04qJzg>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:09:23 -0000

ICANN runs them all?   Really?   I guess that will be a surprise to the IEEE-SA (MAC addresses), and ITU (E164 addresses), to name just two.

manning
bmanning@karoshi.com
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102



On 21June2015Sunday, at 20:02, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>> There are registries of values.   There are “IANA" registries of values.
> 
> Right. ICANN runs them all, and has trademark registrations in relevant areas.  I presume you have read the registrations at the USPTO.
> 
> Fortunately, we have at least a year and probably two before anything will change, so there's no point in having this argument until the names crowd get their act together.
> 
> R's,
> John_______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan