[Ianaplan] IANA Supplemental Aggreement for 2016 Signed

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 24 June 2016 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1133712D1A9 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BseKguPDnxIl for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C0D12D59B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AED300494 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id LUOVmuQzms08 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:09:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1499D300261 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:09:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FB06B497-B453-41B8-ACCB-52CC5C2BBA2B@vigilsec.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:07:34 -0400
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/27t5sDE9ChSXjgkSPmYHWAZplrE>
Subject: [Ianaplan] IANA Supplemental Aggreement for 2016 Signed
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 20:09:12 -0000

The IAOC and ICANN have signed the supplemental agreement for 2016.  It is not effective yet, but the negotiation are complete.  The document is here:

 https://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/ICANN-IETF-2016-SLA-Executed-2016-06-24.pdf

Right before the signatures, it says:

 This agreement will be effective as of 1 October 2016 unless the IANA Agreement
 between NTIA and ICANN has not ended or terminated, and then it will become
 effective at that time, so long as such event occurs within three (3) months of that date.

So, when the NTIA contract goes away, the supplemental agreement words called for by this group will be effective.

Russ