Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Tue, 13 October 2015 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AC91A21BD for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.701
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WCwWHnLeZAnH for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEFC91A1BB0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wieq12 with SMTP id q12so46123985wie.1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JF8iVo13f5gSexlLWousytKuL5ULp73cV6gNF/88BUU=; b=iopfdT11S84Zpwadp+qxyB7qOZXCU6QCrRbJumrxMXQj5dtwav9Rj9Uosy9tZYwvjP hLoz3NBrWGKrXFToj7uIdV0zmCUl0H7Hofy8eetWXcX7kst9/il+7mZlmRpUIHZrb1AS PNmqRS0I4KPB7PMGCXeuAoT2h8fZUQftMfbS9hVOrbSY7LXDMlNi3+Xbr2Jkkeys41mq phgdB9sjoJw3+iWIZXi8z2ziwFk0z7yx4KiFevFBGR170Yvdoo08qJxAt2hX6GmGtmeX xjIxtG1ymef6zmzsMjiw5bKTGiuiODEcAXZXmzlku9b8v6z9YVAjk/S5kAVEKVFlbwWx A4VA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.77.75 with SMTP id q11mr15127262wiw.45.1444761309565; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.171.170 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.171.170 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHDxq1fgAqdb5Kwe6cNn9uK5jS2+wnNVXRFpLY44+Y=4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <56181181.50002@gmail.com> <D23F19BE.27A31A%Jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <561D47DD.2010704@acm.org> <CAF4+nEHDxq1fgAqdb5Kwe6cNn9uK5jS2+wnNVXRFpLY44+Y=4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:35:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6h0LtSHE=b_ERMnENa3BVpYwgCWwfv8386b=YSSJHTkLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438921da45bf5052200b433
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/3P1Rgm9AY5JZwSDDW30aU6eQyfo>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:35:16 -0000

For reference sake, if IETF/ISOC setup could be synonymous to the proposed
PTI(the new IFO) to be setup within ICANN. Then in that sense, yes IETF
does have legal standing.

Cheers!

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 13 Oct 2015 19:31, "Donald Eastlake" <d3e3e3@gmail.com>; wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>; wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > One essential difference is that IETF has an appeal mechanism on process
> > to the Internet Society Board of Trustees.
> > This is the backstop for the IETF.
> >
> > From what I have learned in the ICANN Accountability process, the most
> > legal training I have ever had, the IETF as the IETF might have trouble
> > suing anyone given that is is not a legal person.  Fortunately the IETF
> > does not live in an environment where suits, of either kind, are the
> norm.
>
> Even though I'm right and what you and lots of other people believe is
> wrong :-) I don't usually both to point that out. It is usually not
> worth the effort to argue with people having very strong convictions.
> But either the IETF is just part of the ISOC, which is a corporation
> and can obviously sue or be sued, or the IETF is a separate
> unincorporated non-profit association.
>
> In the United States, unincorporated non-profit associations have
> legal existence and can sue and be sued. To take examples from
> business and labor, for over 150 years the New York Stock Exchange was
> an unincorporated association having numerous employees and contracts
> as wel as the occasional lawsuit, until sometime in the 1950s when it
> incorporated and it only did that then to get the advantage of some US
> Federal tax provisions for pensions that were only available to
> corporations. All or almost all labor unions in the US are
> unincorporated associations (and laws attempting to force them to
> incorporate have been declared to violate the US Constitution as a
> violation of the right of freedom of association). I acted as the
> agent for an unincorporated association which applied for and was
> granted US trademarks (the certificate issued by the US Patent and
> Trademark Office explicit recites that the organization is a "US
> unincorporated association").
>
> The often repeated claim the the IETF does not legally exist is and
> always has been just plain wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
> > avri
> >
> > On 10-Oct-15 12:57, Soininen, Jonne (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> > > Hi Brian,
> > >
> > > like Bernard and Dave said, part of the story is the press tries to
> spin
> > > an interesting story. Partly the story is that there are strong
> emotions
> > > in play at the ICANN in this topic.
> > >
> > > So, the topic is ICANN accountability. The claim is that as long as
> there
> > > was the NTIA contract on IANA there has been a backstop on ICANN's
> > > decisions, especially the board's. The theory is that if ICANN (the
> staff
> > > and the board, not the community) would do something silly NTIA could
> at
> > > least threaten to take IANA away and pressure ICANN to reconsider the
> > > decision get to the right path. However, with the IANA stewardship
> > > transition there would be no backstop anymore and potentially a future
> > > board could go rogue and do whatever they want disregarding the
> community.
> > > Therefore, there needs to be new accountability mechanisms.
> > >
> > > The main accountability mechanisms discussed have been spilling the
> > > complete board, removing a board member and control/veto the ICANN
> budget
> > > and bylaws changes. There is pretty much consensus that in some form or
> > > another these are reasonable requirements. However, the discussion is
> > > about what is the right enforceability mechanism. Enforcement means how
> > > can you legally enforce ICANN/board do something - basically, how can
> you
> > > sue ICANN if the board/staff doesn't do what the community expects it
> to
> > > do.
> > >
> > > In the IETF, we have a bit different approach to these things. I
> wouldn't
> > > think we would have ever the discussion the IETF community should be
> able
> > > to take the IESG or IAB to court. Interesting thought, though... ;)
> > >
> > > I hope this helps.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Jonne.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ianaplan mailing list
> > Ianaplan@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>