Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 07 November 2014 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D191A1B1B for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:51:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3rvd_7kqwIiD for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com (mail-pd0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1CA01A1B14 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z10so3985614pdj.15 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:51:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=5iJbyUJV8+XxEyuWo500yfke+gOXpmi+2456HWSFBC4=; b=ilcyBfsElusqpU7XkpQr0TWW7+xwRmO7y261H5PIOTl0vEzna4KieU+9X2nwAyX9sx 2v6AffemLGWM7YAbYYWafX3VQeU0Z1Jccd47sHzEtPhflwvG0D+Z7Pji/bwQSeudN8W1 pwPWCUw5JDdmkaOfKeNVVQgypnOZS8PU7u4wBFWq/EdOl5tKlv8wTejh4RHb/snHs29b I3Kp7rNdCLEMNWfndfQhTwwTv+Y3JUMXOZfmvJMMcxU6SspCUrmNt4Mbc73+VOsYvHES DMYd5PazK8hMRly5fAJf8vlqbvbXyTepJFdJU+znP+lscvX/Gx3HtqWRu0vvqqU3RvI+ NVYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkQvrwuODhSV3Bm6ULS+9fCI4SwXmx13QKZWpmPmGRiz6elwY9qIC5ngmKOOx69EayabSQ3
X-Received: by 10.68.87.226 with SMTP id bb2mr4407441pbb.136.1415393464458; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316? ([2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id db7sm9615213pdb.27.2014.11.07.12.51.02 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0565A7B4-A77D-4BEC-9BC9-AF7008C0427D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNAEAICOAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:50:58 -1000
Message-Id: <5C3AFF5B-CE0B-49F7-BAAD-1787CEC00E76@virtualized.org>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNAEAICOAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
To: rhill@hill-a.ch
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/46qIH-D46J-s30ybK97GsP1nJ6I
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 20:51:07 -0000

Richard,

On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:11 AM, Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch> wrote:
>> which is
>> what is actually being proposed: they have property, and some are
>> proposing that they have to give it to us without compensation.
> 
> As others have pointed out, ICANN took it from others without compensation.

Could you provide your evidence to back up this accusation of theft?

Regards,
-drc
(ICANN CTO, but speaking only for myself. Really.)