Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call

[Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <[e-mail]>]

On 03/11/2014 18:23, Richard Hill wrote:
> Sorry, I don't agree with that.  That language is too vague for me.
>
> If people are not comfortable with the language that is currently in 02,
> then I suggest that we develop language to the effect that the intellectual
> property rights and the domain name IANA.ORG will be transferred to the ISOC
> Trust (or whatever part of ISOC is the appropriate entity to receive it).
>
> In my view, the mark, and the domain name, belong to ISOC morally, if not
> legally and, as I said before, I'm sure that everybody would agree that ISOC
> will allow whatever entity or entities are providing the IANA function to
> use the mark and the domain name.

...and thus was the can of worms opened. I disagree with entering the
field of property rights wrt IANA itself. Next we'll add that "Internet"
is a Trademark of DARPA. This is not constructive.
Kind regards,

Olivier