Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Tue, 23 June 2015 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFD01A8F3C for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.134
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QZV5NLRJkmGi for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDE9F1A6F11 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 251.47.14.81.rev.sfr.net ([81.14.47.251]:51063 helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1Z7QZ5-0007F6-Ia; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:56:47 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:56:44 +0200
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>,dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <55896464.2040803@cisco.com>
References: <20150619170708.84611.qmail@ary.lan> <3F18936E1587B5F2BB89E800@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <55847BE9.9040507@gmail.com> <5584BC64.7060403@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506192151170.47260@ary.local> <5584D664.90003@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506201928040.47864@ary.local> <55863ABF.8020903@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211008240.48224@ary.local> <5586EB11.5030404@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506211400250.48860@ary.local> <5587A015.9030700@cisco.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506221032250.50421@ary.local> <55881331.9070902@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1506221056420.50578@ary.local> <5588FE8B.3040806@gmail.com> <55896464.2040803@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20150623155648.DDE9F1A6F11@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/4J9nIJYUyWbezZFpVu-yEURW7DE>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:56:50 -0000

The Draft is subject to my appeal. It should not therefore be 
published before the RFC 2026 procedure - which may involve ISOC - is 
completed. In order to have a better hands-on experience of this IANA 
trademark issue, it is my intent to give the "iana.zone" domain name 
to the "international all-network association" in order for them to 
set, experience and operate a mutual documentation and registry system.

This way to proceed turned out to be positive with ISO where we 
eventually allied: in case of an UDRP I will not object to transfer 
the name to who will best protect the users interests. This "who" 
will then have to be legally determinated.

jfc



At 15:51 23/06/2015, Eliot Lear wrote:



>On 6/23/15 8:36 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understood Dave's plan, but what I would suggest (which
> > doesn't involve any bargaining chips as far as I can see) is:
> >
> > 1. State that the IETF Trust is the most appropriate vehicle to hold
> > the IANA IPR as an asset for the entire Internet community. I think
> > that would be a useful addendum to the IANAPLAN document, but it
> > shouldn't be allowed to hold up the RFC publication.
>
>That document is in the RFC Editor queue but is being held for the final
>combined document (that has been the plan all along) so that we can
>either reference or append it to make clear what the final outcome was,
>for the record.  We do not normally amend other text beyond the
>agreement, but this is entirely up to the area director.  I do wonder if
>it would be useful to include as appendices consensus positions such as
>that reached on February 19th in response to the ICG query.
>
>If rough consensus has evolved to a different point, that would be
>useful to clarify.  But again, I would suggest that the point here is
>not to tell the Trust that we require that the domain and the trademark
>and IPR be held, but rather that we simply state that it is our desire
>to retain rights to use of them, should the IFO change, and how that
>happens is a matter of discussion between lawyers and those who are
>negotiating on our behalf, and not engineers.
>
>Eliot
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ianaplan mailing list
>Ianaplan@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan