IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF181A6FEC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:48:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ng62p5kV98jr for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B67E01A00AF for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id bj1so15150964pad.1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:48:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dX8nj5r+u/fw/TjMueoxNVugcMvlMj0kgaONYbn9y9U=; b=kjJR5khpOpj1NuhhLCauKYVGPPRKEqUbWyZoqPRFpXuor3iqjcUyKYcvu7F2tESjNp ULDUW/8/ZXvsbgLnlB1T0RrnWwfXJtbanaU3CYY1YRJqZiWV9uL0mFZy7YRHMiUEHtDj eWS9KPyo+hWbwCj5NRjVPho+8m+j9rZkPa/CMXhJPprXszOdInhZR+Gh/eUULhgIcB6i tx9sA1MCS1SwPXxMDynoiiv5pvHbeUzoFIVK3P1zgCGTe2L3chCpbp7e9n1OnhhYvav/ gHN1OS5Mj7iOrPRlBkAxD21nXiyB9QxoGi4wWutX1HY4BVC7nS0WrRdqefo0NwLAMJmf IhKg==
X-Received: by 10.68.175.196 with SMTP id cc4mr10457946pbc.147.1415130520029; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:48:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (210.199.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.199.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ez1sm546203pdb.86.2014.11.04.11.48.36 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54592D96.8040807@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:48:38 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNMENGCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <5458C4C3.6050605@meetinghouse.net> <D07E3874.135E9F%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
In-Reply-To: <D07E3874.135E9F%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/4MaEDyEzcGQ2dkd-m5tlyliWq9g
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:48:42 -0000

On 05/11/2014 05:10, Peterson, Jon wrote:
> Insisting on the transfer of domains, marks, and identifiers to ourselves
> is not likely to prevent the contingencies we're concerned about - it is
> more likely to precipitate them, by turning this process into a
> confrontation. I think we would need a very different mandate as an
> organization to take this step. It is both reckless and unnecessary.

Exactly.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email