Re: [Ianaplan] [Internetgovtech] NTIA/IANA transition co-ordination group
JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> Thu, 03 July 2014 09:42 UTC
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4431B280A; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 02:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.631
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kn0mmeo-ERoD; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 02:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614B41B27E6; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 02:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 231.74.14.81.rev.sfr.net ([81.14.74.231]:42927 helo=GHM-SAM.dot.dj) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1X2dXJ-0003c5-2g; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 02:42:37 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 11:39:59 +0200
To: IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <49918635-D566-4311-A621-4F16EB341B61@LStAmour.org>
References: <20140701180108.GA51920@mx1.yitter.info> <49918635-D566-4311-A621-4F16EB341B61@LStAmour.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: intl+dot.dj/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/LRxY-nLiaZV5aJdF03219WsWJE4
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, internetgovtech@iab.org, ianatransition@icann.org, "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] [Internetgovtech] NTIA/IANA transition co-ordination group
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:42:40 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140703094241.4466.36369.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
At 16:28 02/07/2014, Lynn St.Amour wrote: > > Russ is an IAB member and Chair of the IAB, and is a member of the > > IAB's IANA Evolution program. Lynn continued as a member of the IAB's > > IANA Evolution program after stepping down recently as CEO of ISOC. These appointments are certainly an extremely wise choice in regard to an homogenous and efficient representation of the I*stablishment. The points now to clarify for them seem to be: 1. the consideration given to the IUsership as either a partner, a collateral or:and an acknowledged contingency planner. 2. ditto for the OpenStand signatorees, endorsers and supporters and ITU 3. the intent of every State and user to transition key Internet domain name functions to the global multistakeholder community. Also, when I consider http://www.ntia.doc.gov/other-publication/2014/iana-functions-and-related-root-zone-management-transition-questions-and-answ I see references made to "protocol numbers and Internet numbering resources", but the term "address" is missing. Have the appointees a clear understanding of what technically the NTIA is: - actually transfering when "the U.S. Commerce Department's National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) [] announces its intent to transition key Internet domain name functions to the global multistakeholder community" - considering as the "global multistakeholder community". Are each and every one included on an equal footing? Are those ones I*organizations and States, Provider, IUser, people? Is this the WSIS and Sao Paulo people centered information society? The whole humanity? Its whole digital ecosystem. I believe that before discussing the stakes one should first agree upon the words being used to describe them. JFC Morfin
- [Ianaplan] NTIA/IANA transition co-ordination gro… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] [Internetgovtech] NTIA/IANA transi… Lynn St.Amour
- Re: [Ianaplan] [Internetgovtech] NTIA/IANA transi… JFC Morfin