Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Fri, 02 October 2015 22:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B641B31A6 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.156
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.156 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SL31OK86GnnA for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6D41A8A5A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CB82005D901; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=V AGjcrEIiFL1CFFe8LRLfcmPxtg=; b=jW/Yr5KnQHJp7tsqt9Lci6ZPiZ8IDDJ6z iEKO7rt6eb/ZAdPzzzzzyNvDHN8pifyTv5xlLqrXP8QF9huOqkOV8FfpmYvJCfog bFBuonhP6566ul0CO4vWr7OszrxWAzxwh5nNPhZpNk7T9tczT91ZvmjtO0wcPPDC 9ms/eeopmA=
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (pool-173-71-198-23.clppva.fios.verizon.net [173.71.198.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: leslie@oceanpurl.net) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E98F2005D82D; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 15:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 18:31:13 -0400
Message-ID: <2FE967B1-8ACD-4997-9759-986C1481ADBF@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <D838CBAB-B68F-407A-9D83-8CAA745D00F9@vigilsec.com>
References: <56A1B728-98DF-409A-B2B6-2624F53FE175@cooperw.in> <3A58359B-420B-4FEC-B812-4659D980C5D3@vigilsec.com> <CAD_dc6gSKTURuXkFuay8dUKm6i+c9amEgmRQ_-Y37C_hv5i45Q@mail.gmail.com> <20150929151542.GB86614@mx2.yitter.info> <560AC921.4090700@gih.com> <D838CBAB-B68F-407A-9D83-8CAA745D00F9@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5141)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/6AsHY5eFjiGMIR7Hi8pJRL60qDk>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:31:18 -0000
At this point, I’m simply going to observe that the WG does not seem to raise any objection to the statement that informal coordination exists today and will continue, which is consistent with the commitment requested by the ICG: “The three operational communities have a long history of cooperation as needed to help ensure the smooth functioning of the DNS and the Internet. A number of comments were concerned that the three IANA functions could end up being carried out by different operators and suggested that there was a need for some information exchange and coordination between the operational communities to ensure a proper understanding of the impact a change might have on the operation of the other functions (perhaps because of interdependencies between the functions or because of shared resources or key staff). This information exchange might also help in coordinating action in the case of remedying operational difficulties. For this to work, the three operational communities need to commit to coordinating and cooperating as necessary when changing operator, whether by leveraging existing coordination mechanisms or new ones. Can the protocol parameters operational community provide such a commitment? “ Leslie. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Leslie Daigle Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises ldaigle@thinkingcat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- On 29 Sep 2015, at 14:00, Russ Housley wrote: > Olivier: > >> On 29/09/2015 16:15, Andrew Sullivan wrote: >>> I am therefore not convinced even a little bit that additional >>> formal >>> commitments, rules, processes, or anything of that sort, are >>> advisable. The goal is to make the Internet better, not to achieve >>> a >>> nicely designed process. As the WG (and, in other contexts, the >>> IAB) >>> said, the appoach we're using today (which is mostly informal) is >>> working well. There is no reason to invent new ways of ensuring >>> that >>> communication when the communication now flows without such >>> inventions. >> >> I understand the reticence in "if it ain't broken, don't fix it". The >> recommendation was made by several entities, including the ALAC. We >> were >> concerned that whilst today there appears to be several informal >> channels, the future might not keep it this way. So we felt that it >> would be a good idea to keep at least a formal channel open so that >> we >> don't end up with one operational community deciding to split without >> finding a way to keep the three functions operated by the same IANA >> functions operator. > > Please take a look at the comments from the IAB to the ICG (see > https://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence-reports-documents/2015-2/iab-comments-on-icg-proposal/). > This part is especially relevant here: > > Informal and loosely-coupled coordination > has worked well in the past, and it produced the coherent ICG proposal > without formal liaisons among the communities. We believe that this > web > of relationships is a strong expression of the multistakeholder model, > and that there is no need to concentrate these relationships within > new > ICANN structures. The IAB does not oppose additional formal links in > principle if they are found to be useful in the future, and we believe > we have all of the necessary mechanisms for adding them. In general, > however, we prefer informal coordination and communication among the > communities, and we generally prefer to avoid creating additional > organizational structures. We believe this organizational model > reflects the way the Internet works. > >> I'd see it as an opportunity to enhance collaboration between >> operational communities. As individuals we are not immortal. I have >> no >> idea what the next generations will be like and whether this >> collegial >> collaboration will continue. > > The operational communities need to have informal communication among > themseleves whether they share the same IANA functions operator or > not. > > To me, the best response to the ICG is that informal coordination > existed today and we will continue it in the future. > > Russ > > _______________________________________________ > Ianaplan mailing list > Ianaplan@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
- [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Eric Burger
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dan Schlitt
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ray Pelletier
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Curran
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Geoff Huston
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Russ Housley
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jefsey
- [Ianaplan] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Question from the … Alissa Cooper
- [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Russ Housley
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG JFC Morfin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG John Levine
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Roger Jørgensen
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Russ Housley
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Ted Hardie
- Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG Jari Arkko