[Ianaplan] response to a question posted by on the NRO list by Vint
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 18 May 2015 20:26 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDFB1A8AD1 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h_4Sq9pw26hQ for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9197A1B2A7D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 13:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1012CCD1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:26:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ygeg38ZVAkwB for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:26:13 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5282CC5A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:26:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C9C4C3F6-EB60-4287-B8E5-D699DC9E544F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Message-Id: <5EC90FAF-772C-4454-9526-0FAB863BA9D0@piuha.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:26:11 +0300
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/6tVOIG6cIHHRjhNuQVyK2WNrVGI>
Subject: [Ianaplan] response to a question posted by on the NRO list by Vint
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 20:26:21 -0000
For transparency, I wanted to copy you on a question from Vint and an answer from me. This exchange was on the NRO list, see https://www.nro.net/pipermail/ianaxfer/2015-May/000523.html. Vint asked: > to the IETF/IAB and its associated community: > > Is there a capability within the IETF/IAB operation that could serve as a > backup in the event that ICANN's IANA function is unable to perform the > parameter registry function satisfactorily? and I replied: > As a general policy, the IETF maintains backup copies of data associated with the services that we employ. Examples of this include the IANA registry and RFC Editor services. A standard business practice on our part. But the important thing is that we are committed providing these services to the IETF and implementor communities, per community needs, under all circumstances now and in the future. > > Jari Arkko, IETF Chair