Re: [Ianaplan] One more attempt at text (Re: Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review)
"Richard Hill" <rhill@hill-a.ch> Tue, 25 August 2015 09:20 UTC
Return-Path: <rhill@hill-a.ch>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBD01B2A72 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 02:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yj2SFWR_U5Cv for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 02:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88F71B2A6B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 02:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.infomaniak.ch (smtp3.infomaniak.ch [84.16.68.91]) by smtp-sh.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7P9KJAT002251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:20:19 +0200
Received: from RHillNew (adsl-178-39-130-230.adslplus.ch [178.39.130.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp3.infomaniak.ch (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7P9KGpJ019466; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:20:16 +0200
From: Richard Hill <rhill@hill-a.ch>
To: 'Eliot Lear' <lear@cisco.com>, 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "'Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)'" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "'Ianaplan@Ietf. Org'" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <3A072B1E-FE4C-476E-B6F8-0309F377D221@thinkingcat.com> <55DB487A.2060303@cisco.com> <6f7112a4-4313-4c33-b7d9-a238f01920f8@email.android.com> <55DB4F0E.9000105@cisco.com> <aced0eb7-deed-48e4-85cf-a0ffe55b34aa@email.android.com> <55DB5C8E.20406@cisco.com> <55DB7C4C.7070801@cs.tcd.ie> <55DB99D6.6080201@gmail.com> <001b01d0defb$0b93d660$22bb8320$@ch> <55DC043E.8060004@cisco.com> <006d01d0defc$c3c18970$4b449c50$@ch> <55DC079E.4000202@cisco.com> <009c01d0defd$7cbb3480$76319d80$@ch> <55DC0901.30702@cisco.com> <00d501d0defe$98978270$c9c68750$@ch> <55DC0BA2.9000301@cisco.com> <010d01d0df01$65fa7ae0$31ef70a0$@ch> <55DC30CF.5090304@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <55DC30CF.5090304@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:20:31 +0200
Message-ID: <01aa01d0df17$4c08a060$e419e120$@ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01AB_01D0DF28.0F917060"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdDfFcU6Uyh9lhnhR1i3wu2pVJhc3wAAWxhg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/7FMz48AVvCeu3NMOL3SkfHAUhjQ>
Cc: 'Marc Blanchet' <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] One more attempt at text (Re: Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:20:32 -0000
Dear Eliot, I continue to prefer the last proposal put forth by Leslie. I suggest that you and I agree to disagree and allow others to comment. Best, Richard From: Eliot Lear [mailto:lear@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:10 To: Richard Hill; 'Brian E Carpenter'; 'Stephen Farrell'; 'Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)'; 'Ianaplan@Ietf. Org' Cc: 'Marc Blanchet' Subject: One more attempt at text (Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review) Hi Richard, On 8/25/15 8:43 AM, Richard Hill wrote: This group is consistent: it supports the protocols part of the ICG proposal because that part is exactly what this group agreed by rough consensus, and it request that the bit in paragraph 3062 be referenced also elsewhere. This group has not discussed the other parts of the ICG proposal, so there is no reason why this group should take a position regarding those parts of the proposal. The proposal will either go forward or not. There are not THREE proposals at this point. Rather there is a single proposal. In as much as you had concerns about the individual components those rightfully belong within the components as we have said all along, for the very reasons you did not raise those issues here: you were found in the rough in those other communities. Further, as I wrote, a number of us have read all the proposals, with an eye toward finding overlap. At this point in time the issue for the IETF is really quite simple: do we want the proposal to go forward or not? That is what this working group is being asked for a position on. So, one more attempt at text: The IETF IANAPLAN WG prefers that the ICG proposal be advanced, as no concerns have been raised that would impact standards development or the operation of the protocol parameters registries. The IETF raised two transition points that are mentioned in Paragraph 3062 of the proposal. We would ask that they be referenced in Part 0, Section V of the proposal as well. We take no position on the names or numbers community components. Eliot
- [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context i… Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Avri Doria
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… JFC Morfin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Seth Johnson
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- [Ianaplan] One more attempt at text (Re: Updated … Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] One more attempt at text (Re: Upda… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] One more attempt at text (Re: Upda… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Ianaplan] One more attempt at text (Re: Upda… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Andrei Robachevsky
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep conte… John Levine