IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Transition proposal for naming-related functions

Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> Tue, 05 May 2015 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mueller@syr.edu>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AE61B2D15 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2015 17:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FgY8dsU6nX3e for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2015 17:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.syr.edu (smtp2.syr.edu [128.230.18.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF20C1A1B82 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2015 17:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX13-MBX-07.ad.syr.edu (ex13-mbx-07.ad.syr.edu [128.230.108.138]) by smtp2.syr.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t450b9Pt019763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 May 2015 20:37:09 -0400
Received: from EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu (128.230.108.144) by EX13-MBX-07.ad.syr.edu (128.230.108.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Mon, 4 May 2015 20:37:08 -0400
Received: from EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu ([128.230.108.144]) by EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu ([128.230.108.144]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Mon, 4 May 2015 20:36:50 -0400
From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
To: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ianaplan] Transition proposal for naming-related functions
Thread-Index: AQHQgoAHj+0B7o/H6UWM+dQT/ZFJip1qoYAAgAHySQCAAAPtgP//+mYQ
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 00:36:49 +0000
Message-ID: <a71de85f29a64647abf846b2e27d53eb@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
References: <6FADE19B-E3BD-48F8-9A2D-91FA6F88E6DC@cooperw.in> <554637C4.2010400@gondrom.org> <64F5CADC-5739-4CB1-B2E3-BAA3B21DA0EB@cooperw.in> <C6F030D4-58DF-4B2B-969E-6D4F2B00C742@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6F030D4-58DF-4B2B-969E-6D4F2B00C742@shinkuro.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [108.26.56.166]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a71de85f29a64647abf846b2e27d53ebEX13MBX13adsyredu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68, 1.0.33, 0.0.0000 definitions=2015-05-04_05:2015-05-04,2015-05-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1505050005
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/7IhPVtWu-eoAFnHUaqy7LpAm16A>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Transition proposal for naming-related functions
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 00:37:13 -0000

Excellent. Thank you.

ICANN publishes the IANA registries for anyone to use without charge, and it asserts no ownership or control of the information in the registries.  No matter what additional structures are created, this basic rule must continue.  There are no subtle or hidden meanings here, and if anyone manages to see an ambiguity, I can assure you none is intended and we will be happy to restate this in language that removes the perceived ambiguity.  Anything less would be inconsistent with the spirit, history and ethic of the IANA function.

Steve Crocker
Chair, ICANN Board of Directors

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email