IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 18 February 2015 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4251A9105 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:42:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TclmEj4Ew6cs for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C3B1A911A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4761C2CC5D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:42:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gDg1iHzZNNt9 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:42:39 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0DC2CC4D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:42:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E223ACFB-4361-44B1-BC2F-D29FD635C4D2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Message-Id: <76072B2A-DECE-4896-93DC-28637F6864F9@piuha.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:42:39 +0200
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com> <20150216173555.15904.qmail@ary.lan> <CAOW+2dv61TOLKG90gJwkxkyEueHYUuMqz0W62VOBCSvd0kXS-g@mail.gmail.com> <54E22EA3.1080408@cs.tcd.ie>
To: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <54E22EA3.1080408@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/8YzDgZYotfEVdtqUoQZbRXVvPKQ>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 07:42:44 -0000

FWIW, I agree with the suggested points from Leslie/Dave.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email