IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] [Iana-strategy] Pete Resnick's Abstain on charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: (with COMMENT)

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Fri, 05 September 2014 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8EA1A0348; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUYP9kl8_NzX; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 382631A0347; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id rd3so21188422pab.24 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=LDU7IhJ2APBrIakasBnRBwyO9rCaVe7ik21ykojhSVE=; b=FiAIg9Fk317khQBcRT4lSM1psIr8H4fqn8Hegr3B29UOrynZ2dF0nEkgliPc4mwjjp uwzpsDPMAzF7T5GJ2C5bA4MrpGfJrykGj0rD6U0KA1CVile9afxyIjEBAcfyGE+8JWPB t8RxqrEhAlL9Nwir/jrhRIMVKhBpenJBfn0bqqC43JbD3wDXJTZKb6V8aZwpnpZmEmyx FaIOUpKHxYOG+sHDyzUrtro6KzK9Dw0rAuRplWUgU1xSByQ7qGMiH+hwoJk1YiljO908 MyZI1lsk04t9bY0K/EpBMhsQ6WkeGP1ic+6JDXoPa/8kPWOEoqzXjdLu/pgvdAjMmK+5 GRoQ==
X-Received: by 10.70.90.198 with SMTP id by6mr15737568pdb.164.1409883374763; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (c-71-227-237-49.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.227.237.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm416030pdn.26.2014.09.04.19.16.13 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20140904025929.18297.90860.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <20140904025929.18297.90860.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <044CF0CA-581B-44F8-A4FE-38EE42D3CCE3@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11D257)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 19:16:11 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/9E5Z3Y34FWDfTEvwk2JnAI0jZl4
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:16:49 -0700
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, "iana-strategy@i1b.org" <iana-strategy@i1b.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] [Iana-strategy] Pete Resnick's Abstain on charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 02:16:17 -0000

On Sep 3, 2014, at 19:59, "Pete Resnick" <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> NEW
>   Fully documenting the interaction between the IETF and the operator
>   of IETF protocol parameters registries may require detailed terms of
>   agreements or other details of procedures that are normally delegated
>   to and handled by the IAB or IAOC. The working group will not attempt
>   to produce or discuss documentation for these details, but will
>   request the IAB or IAOC to provide them, either to be included as an
>   appendix to the WG's output document, or in a separate document
>   provided by the IAB or IAOC.

[BA] To be clear, the IAOC does not require the consensus of the IANAPLAN WG to negotiate SLAs and other agreements with the IANA functions operator chosen by the IAB. They were granted that authority by RFC 6220. Also, the IANAPLAN WG does not substitute for legal counsel, no matter how many "amateur lawyers" might join the WG.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email