Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> Mon, 19 January 2015 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511D11B2BFB for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8dxUbzgargh for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 137471B2BFC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [64.129.1.11] (helo=[172.20.7.122]) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jcurran@istaff.org>) id 1YDGat-00032V-N2 for ianaplan@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:58:32 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Originating-IP: 64.129.1.11
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19lKUKzzDaASlC+HYw7xI4n
From: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AE36BF89-443E-45DD-86DB-EAB5D847E641"
Message-Id: <B72B987D-4306-4CF0-910C-5AA9888CF1A0@istaff.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:58:30 -1000
References: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in>
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/9Kr5cgNEKyfGTZKmd5ro6WI9GpE>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:58:41 -0000

On Jan 19, 2015, at 4:33 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>; wrote:
> 
> After draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response was submitted to the ICG, the ICG received the following comment: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html>
FYI - <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00019.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00019.html>>
/John