IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] feedback regarding the combined proposal

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Sun, 09 August 2015 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5391A8AB7 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 08:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLvQGNlrk5p2 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 08:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECDEE1A8AA7 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabyb7 with SMTP id yb7so88336738pab.0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=BwcKPdPo+22EUiCokbCy6vx6xwqSRITEs0HvMR9I4AE=; b=LgNCR0ioOFWuQej68ECuCWetT0cIJGJQU2JJ0f0J2NybQgcU+f95qmRn/ICsJkw5nh PSSWWURPGx4Y5HNY5c7vhwp9dOtTO1IusJ4K0m1kJ1zj/vGiilgMmuFTkOC9mAk5qGal tiZsvFKFmreZ4OwFh3YVuidAKL6TJkpivcm+iwGcrqtIG59HFfKKstfqfMKDr3RGqaxE D8uOUMcpG3ee+7YpvYeDlOaAGyAt7Pebpzs3s1DMPb5K5eVAYxgDpzrRDU66iJsY1MFL PnhmICe6m4wt71dY6vnElJLugPn9fTWpJSxLNvaCmPOmT4bYeAqp2eXAvKU+SYC93syY 49xw==
X-Received: by 10.68.103.5 with SMTP id fs5mr36149123pbb.55.1439133091558; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.104.99.172] ([167.220.103.105]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b4sm16784381pdn.42.2015.08.09.08.11.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Aug 2015 08:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
References: <7DAC25D2-2321-4918-806C-A598C97F562C@piuha.net> <55C74A93.2090300@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <55C74A93.2090300@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F9E7BCC9-9D38-4B40-9A30-DF22E7210AFC@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 08:11:29 -0700
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/9_tB_7gZiTZFXsYg_PXw-rysydA>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] feedback regarding the combined proposal
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 15:11:33 -0000

On Aug 9, 2015, at 5:41 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> If this agreement is in place, great.  That should be stated.  If the
> agreement is not yet in place, then that should be stated in the
> transition section (Section V) of the ICG summary.

[BA] The ICG proposal includes requirements for agreements. Compared to an actual agreement this is akin to the sound of one hand clapping.

Due to legal concerns relating to current NTIA-ICANN contract limitations, agreements cannot be signed at this time.  We do not even really know when discussions will be able to resume, what additional concerns might arise when they do, or even whether the requirements can be met once all the obstacles to discussion are removed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email