Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Mon, 08 September 2014 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B78D1A0412 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9eVQ8QyGIRlC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 575B51A035F for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id bj1so2054090pad.23 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=MDWKzu9fRohBx1SymcDOYiOuYgGg3DlNrCkRPkCeYNc=; b=MdhFHNuSkU01tc3Iw2iSkLFFy+TMpIDhqYm3t94CY+YSfKyn7GFsFlFJx0wfjgmKBP I8zCWfTBHfqLsIw3ntM3HuM0VZ3cbgxqucnlLDwHuuASnmfAIzBB+xnXrzstxAAeb+Xz 0lZ6TlikUTaN9/nMWN4/FXF3JiruXKMk+JUGw8evcnu4FdrwjnmVX3ZOZHtmrf3bIwPM a4xMftC3o8jB7N5k6w6Nv6q+KJQupiPLfThfhRRFf0D7o71fIz88bTce3jgnyuLJVMWx 3uSG2ku2Bg9Z+k+0I2LMTxAzNaXnhFWgn+ivOhHoL66rOxw/YfXd3r2FBrTSxGsY127j 21LQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9pq3t/kHBplOhciZSFmg9lwJH1HcHpVMFKYt6wAoI83mXgc9UfN/361LzrN0SdZKp1isy
X-Received: by 10.70.50.170 with SMTP id d10mr49742897pdo.33.1410214327992; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.11] ([73.162.11.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hs8sm9739870pbc.35.2014.09.08.15.12.06 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5EFF32A7-AE1A-4FAE-A5DD-09EAE1FB5B69"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140908134733.0ccd5790@resistor.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:12:05 -0700
Message-Id: <BCF6A87E-F5E2-4924-A655-D64C32E47F93@virtualized.org>
References: <540DB003.1060900@cisco.com> <CAD_dc6iX9xxJWK5PNkr4vUjerXEV=Ud_P8Of7NnmFUK-2ckSdg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140908134733.0ccd5790@resistor.net>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/9d4QZlJ-P6wOfng2XRf6Pz5FZhk
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 22:12:14 -0000

On Sep 8, 2014, at 2:45 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> At 12:06 08-09-2014, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>> For now I am gonna assume this is a regional effort i.e the apnic region's view.
>> The understanding I gathered is that there is yet to be a global process to engage the numbers community and such is still in formation.
> 
> A person could use the existing global (numbers) process.  

I’m unsure whether the global process would be applicable here.  I thought that process applies only to numbers allocation policy that affects the IANA numbers function.  

> It could take about a year if the person is lucky.  A regional (numbers) process I am familiar with would take around four months if the person is lucky.

Perhaps “exceptionally lucky and on a topic with zero controversy” would be a better characterization.  I’m actually unaware of any instance of any RIR process (at least these days) than has run from start to finish in only four months.

> There were some interesting questions on a RIR mailing list.  It seems that people would like to understand what all the discussions are about.

Which RIR mailing list?

Thanks,
-drc