Re: [Ianaplan] Adrian Farrel's No Objection on charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: (with COMMENT)

[JFC Morfin <[e-mail]>]

At 15:49 04/09/2014, Russ Housley wrote:
>I'd like to see it published as an RFC at the point in time that the 
>proposal is actually submitted to NTIA.

+1
However it should be published with the indication that the IETF 
Trust puts it in public domain, or at least authorizes derivative work  .
jfc


>Russ
>
>
>On Sep 4, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>
> > Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for
> > charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ianaplan/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Notwithstanding that "IETF consensus document" normally means "an RFC on
> > which there has been IETF last call and where there is consensus for
> > publication" I feel that
> >   The IANAPLAN working group is chartered to produce an IETF consensus
> >   document
> > needs to be clarified since it leave ambiguity as to whether an RFC is
> > the intended output. there are three options (pick one!)
> > - "...that will be published as an RFC"
> > - "...that may be published as an RFC"
> > - "...that will be produced as an Internet-Draft and submitted to the
> > ICANN thingy committee when consensus has been reached."
> >
> > ---
> >
> > In view of Joel's comment about timeliness, I wonder whether
> > micro-management through the milestones might be helpful.
> >
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ianaplan mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan