Re: [Ianaplan] returning to the topic of IANA trademarks and domains

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sat, 19 September 2015 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695591B5D3C for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHZnz_DqIhiI for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118421B5D3B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B8A2CD0E; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:48:59 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKLzV5BMjraR; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:48:59 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5828C2CC5C; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:48:58 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0A4BB767-8F58-41CF-95B3-9EF6527A23B0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAD_dc6h64ZFnyn_Z-CyYNBgYV4Jwq2uMPQ2489oMxVwDOfvE9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:48:57 -0700
Message-Id: <9715FA5A-97BE-4B24-851B-B377CF3EC6A1@piuha.net>
References: <695427AA-50BB-4C51-9764-4DCEAFF31993@piuha.net> <CAD_dc6gcuf8K95JYz1GjjLNow6aE0r4zeCV9nMGqxrebGCUbQw@mail.gmail.com> <757177E3-697A-43FA-960E-827AFA7C9869@piuha.net> <CAD_dc6h64ZFnyn_Z-CyYNBgYV4Jwq2uMPQ2489oMxVwDOfvE9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/BT9oTtfhoKrT5vVp8N2QBWv86fQ>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] returning to the topic of IANA trademarks and domains
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 13:49:02 -0000

Seun,

> I assume the IFO in agreement 3 would be specified by the respective OCs in agreement 2 and any subsequent review of 3 will have dependency on 2. Is that correct?

I think so.

Jari