Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Thu, 11 September 2014 06:09 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48FF1A048C for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRAIEBTrETRu for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA8781A0479 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j5so6892260qga.8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8D1FuwGUTNVxZOycpdkpP/FRzhson/bSdsnTAhT+t/c=; b=s3vALFuHn+eR75sRUSsOvav9GDf+Q7RodQIW0wAl3IzxMC3u/jUGg1sVy7VK9Icnn3 1KPGTgTXLWr7zS+cO8oqNN+s2oinz8C0K50CtF6/6w0EnDMsOsSJPUFG26fSfFUCeedK XIFPJlWuWERfgfqCidhRqJ+ZwMRKBfzkLRrxGwOJ5II5+wYBdfJV8zZ6dKGciw53nYqn +1dymBQXPFefGPmWjElMhcK3ahVNSOalA185RNpOmNuFr9SkXMeJ++P2Kxi6qmetLACP DIntfTVgocODKGaaGLq2/Ix/tLazPeOqSroTkb6d6Ri5WAIpdvZUZqw3iw1gWAx47pSo uMOQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.102.83 with SMTP id v77mr42684040qge.38.1410415778090; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.185.199 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.185.199 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5410D0A3.7010306@gmail.com>
References: <540DB003.1060900@cisco.com> <a9927883f15b4da7aa03735b5efeae10@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <6FA57B50-D8D1-462C-989E-F3258F7F9B70@oslo.net> <4eb09168d80b4f58bf7fce5c3990754f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <540E0568.2010405@cs.tcd.ie> <5410B0B3.4050202@acm.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20140910143649.0b332770@resistor.net> <5410D0A3.7010306@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:09:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6g3jdHhU=AN1CBpRvgFqtpttQsV5Da1bP-mEu-J3n=P5A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c171a270577d0502c4034b"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/C17zGxNAGZt67gbgMvAlRbh8aGo
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, avri <avri@acm.org>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:09:40 -0000

While SM and Brian are both right about this, I don't think the IANA
oversight is more of a IP allocation policy issue(otherwise it would have
been treated by RIRs in a manner similar to PDP). It's the overall
management of resources and I don't think it's entirely inappropriate to
engage the source of all the resources in this matter.

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 10 Sep 2014 23:28, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 11/09/2014 10:06, S Moonesamy wrote:
> > Hello,
> > At 13:12 10-09-2014, Avri Doria wrote:
> >> Isn't it the IETF that directed IANA to work directly with the RIRs on
> >> allocations of unallocated addresses?  Why is asking how it all works
> >> inappropriate for those responsible for making the original role
> >> assignment?
> >
> > In my opinion the answer to the first question is no.  The assignment of
> > IP address blocks is considered as a policy issue.  Such an issue would
> > be an ICANN [1] matter.
>
> This is correct; address (and TLD) policy was exempted from the IETF/ICANN
> agreement from the very first draft, except for the technical special uses.
>
>   Brian
>
> > I am skipping the second question as it is
> > looks like a Working Group Chair matter.
> >
> > Regards,
> > S. Moonesamy
> >
> > 1. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/bylaws-2012-02-25-en
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ianaplan mailing list
> > Ianaplan@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>