IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 10 September 2014 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE111A6FFC for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSjSFmKdaoua for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F82E1A6FB9 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id lj1so9361851pab.27 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iZn+tXA1nuJo56A+6XNOs07cNYlhmykWXYS1N5IiRKg=; b=rYR2h5LKMx1BOSDk7pN7/8EfboNrwgYcKTiTW4ZzFm3VQzfUpM7viufabCbb5IWJ8v Pie+zlIlr/IK4JPsmm+7ltg8ddOCEMAz9xjTCHYCx2dFbMb2du7F2ayw2JtR/aJ6/xbU WBJLRxwoWlLspofrQ6fa+Sd1Xav9Cu6nixpGqgaGgBxnIHpH5+sSsN6K++M05m8tZ4MG 4mJ6oboWcRt/moSWFHlOSjK5j5xWkbLDADT1YAAiG1Wre3NQ1086Oolz5uPDGo5502wX a0iRsRwiG2KSCJoZVVK8b/6PCPSsIxYV/7b3sK9RtQbfqAFgKt04xqG2qiVUkGTr2JOe QnJA==
X-Received: by 10.66.122.99 with SMTP id lr3mr69371704pab.0.1410388124952; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (4.195.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.195.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gi14sm6002323pbd.10.2014.09.10.15.28.42 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5410D0A3.7010306@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:28:51 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <540DB003.1060900@cisco.com> <a9927883f15b4da7aa03735b5efeae10@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <6FA57B50-D8D1-462C-989E-F3258F7F9B70@oslo.net> <4eb09168d80b4f58bf7fce5c3990754f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <540E0568.2010405@cs.tcd.ie> <5410B0B3.4050202@acm.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20140910143649.0b332770@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140910143649.0b332770@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/CCwH0bcXI3pdms5tocXT4shPeEE
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:28:47 -0000

On 11/09/2014 10:06, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hello,
> At 13:12 10-09-2014, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Isn't it the IETF that directed IANA to work directly with the RIRs on
>> allocations of unallocated addresses?  Why is asking how it all works
>> inappropriate for those responsible for making the original role
>> assignment?
> 
> In my opinion the answer to the first question is no.  The assignment of
> IP address blocks is considered as a policy issue.  Such an issue would
> be an ICANN [1] matter.  

This is correct; address (and TLD) policy was exempted from the IETF/ICANN
agreement from the very first draft, except for the technical special uses.

  Brian

> I am skipping the second question as it is
> looks like a Working Group Chair matter.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> 1. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/bylaws-2012-02-25-en
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email