Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Tue, 20 January 2015 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCA01ACD92 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:41:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i95xXW5jpYvV for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958F71ACD4B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.15]) by scintmta01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8101D32E57C; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:41:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: from itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmeg01-14.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 6993_1ff5_94bb65bf_7e0e_4791_86c0_41a2c58c7e9c; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:40:59 +0900
Received: from [133.2.210.64] (unknown [133.2.210.64]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014EABF546; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:40:59 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <54BDC03B.1080002@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:40:59 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in> <B72B987D-4306-4CF0-910C-5AA9888CF1A0@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <B72B987D-4306-4CF0-910C-5AA9888CF1A0@istaff.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/CGIfaNRvz0eaNk4SxNsYT-6UkNU>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:41:47 -0000

John - Thanks for this detailed writeup! I hope Richard will read and 
understand it.

I'd also like to note that the only thing Richard does, in his own 
words, is "highlighting ... concerns".

Regards,   Martin.

On 2015/01/20 02:58, John Curran wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 4:33 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>; wrote:
>>
>> After draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response was submitted to the ICG, the ICG received the following comment: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html>
> FYI - <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00019.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00019.html>>
> /John
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>