Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Mon, 09 February 2015 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B371A1B0B for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:42:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjFsom6adkjf for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:42:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.246.244]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4A21A1B0E for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:42:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; bh=gb1hv9CuurmCHDC2b5pr8hvTBf+jyBXymqzAvqlEseQ=; b=ZfvbjdeCKLxDI6BIxurOJHJpLDvYVJaDOeClCyAQnUvxgOYBbsvW7WLYQaaIWt15SwN2QRkyqVj1FsJoTfTTbu7ZJcGvesy/OrgpDcD+WAjaxQauKo0LvbiBLQXGf7N3VUitxIqnYsjVbxE1aXOQ4x1uzObWFYddWr0xu49cNtk=;
Received: from ip68-100-74-115.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.74.115]:55787 helo=[192.168.15.137]) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1YKrPN-00076y-T9 for ianaplan@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 08:42:07 -0800
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F98CF85E-DAE3-4A24-8FD3-FDF0346A4E68"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <54D8CC7E.7030100@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:41:59 -0500
Message-Id: <AC790ADC-C4CC-4D8E-B11A-138FF58D6D8D@standardstrack.com>
References: <F22D7C95-49EE-4BB9-9ED9-7475736A46C7@cooperw.in> <01870CB5-34E3-450A-910E-5A18D600B27B@piuha.net> <54D8C55F.9070007@dcrocker.net> <20150209144754.GA5582@mx1.yitter.info> <54D8CC7E.7030100@dcrocker.net>
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz104.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/De1uzmWEPkyZCvhpPcHlEn2ebas>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:42:57 -0000

I like this language. It captures our willingness to have the IETF Trust hold the registration while also capturing our disinterest in fighting for it.

> On Feb 9, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> In terms of making a discrete statement, perhaps this translates to:
> 
>     The IETF is willing to have the IETF Trust hold registration of
> IANA.ORG, if that is the preference produced from the IANA Stewardship
> Transition Coordination Group process.