Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> Mon, 24 August 2015 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752791ACD32 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.264
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTVtJlv_FL_B for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECA21A889D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.208]) by atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7OGf4YS025901 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:41:04 -0400
Received: (qmail 5170 invoked by uid 0); 24 Aug 2015 16:41:04 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 68.15.42.104
X-Authenticated-UID: avri@ella.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (avri@ella.com@68.15.42.104) by 0 with ESMTPA; 24 Aug 2015 16:41:03 -0000
References: <3A072B1E-FE4C-476E-B6F8-0309F377D221@thinkingcat.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
Organization: Technicalities
Message-ID: <55DB491F.5010304@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:41:03 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3A072B1E-FE4C-476E-B6F8-0309F377D221@thinkingcat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150824-0, 08/24/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/Dui8v90tyybbEFOIx0Dt_D_MoNU>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: avri@acm.org
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:41:07 -0000

Hi,

Makes sense.

avri


On 24-Aug-15 12:22, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Bearing in mind the context below, it seems to us that the text
> currently under discussion for consensus (with thanks to Brian and
> Richard, all) is:
>
> “The IETF IANAPLAN working group supports the draft ICG proposal going
> forward, as far as the Protocol Parameters function is concerned.  The
> IETF raised two transition points that are mentioned in Paragraph 3062
> of the proposal.  We would ask that they be referenced in Part 0,
> Section V of the proposal as well.”
>
> Assuming no further objection/amendment, that is the text we will call
> on Friday.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Leslie&Marc.
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus