Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?

Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com> Mon, 19 October 2015 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A58B1A8AB5 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iBc6ml8WjUa for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com (mail-qg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D461A9004 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgad10 with SMTP id d10so74540056qga.3 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=iU6pEEsP04UET/kQGAnwv1FXLpgpM1A/fKgk09Z0dgI=; b=J5ngMwE4sx/iexuOVcyuDr4rMkOc6IJCB9tV8jjxfyT5Ky9ypMxheN3iWKA+xh1clO 6XPsdgghFwZcQoOdRrXfe19WvMtIHtlQBw72b6oXg+uQergskCyfjvGUr2YlBLxuLeKN sVzlptLrVcGSWMzqJxiB7FAzGgj/eq39Eeowlr5ImKnFxQ3IOBmVKKcg5FK3sQp8A1Ma TgCPUBVD3jdnQwiA3gBay2Q6L4oUUoiaoET4loiwZVOnI/E3jPMFGdcfKsiuGgHe1TWE +qAzc1tRlYUOfophPvlhHWUV4b6C1LX4KsQeB5I0Hyt+SZ5zgVGC+niKbCXx01A2gNMN 67+w==
X-Received: by 10.140.237.209 with SMTP id i200mr39574420qhc.92.1445284135101; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.207.72 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151019183240.61852.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <CAJkfFBzDGLMuvn9GA156wSCmRNA-q8DAdXxGubuzJSzzB7Jstg@mail.gmail.com> <20151019183240.61852.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Seth Johnson <seth.p.johnson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:48:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJkfFBxmYTO7svrOaL7Qzjzkz-tir_fiYoymo7Lsuunh=pUi4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/FjWcB42M1VHvU-LNdNQ92S1R7cc>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What's happening at ICANN?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:49:02 -0000

Bill of Rights.  Fundamental rights in constitutional acts in general.
They are limits on government, set by the people as prior to the
regular acts of the government.  Other rights do not have that status.
Courts apply the "strict scrutiny" standard of review for these rights
precisely because they have this priority.


Seth


On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:32 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>; wrote:
>>The "more technical" areas have had the ability to operate in that way
>>because they are in a stewardship context where governmental inroads
>>have been proscribed.
>
> You keep saying this.  Could you provide a pointer to the relevant
> section of the law, please?
>
> R's,
> John