IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] on considering consensus

Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Tue, 25 August 2015 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306621A891D for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.434
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.434 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIER5hku4Ibt for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 585C91A88D3 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 251.47.14.81.rev.sfr.net ([81.14.47.251]:60688 helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1ZUN4b-0007Uo-PV; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:52:10 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:52:03 +0200
To: ocl@gih.com, john-ietf@jck.com
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <55DC9F86.40002@gih.com>
References: <55DBFC39.5000701@cisco.com> <55DC0030.5080809@gmail.com> <55DC00CD.9040804@cisco.com> <A446C143EF3E8721BB647FA6@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <55DC8ABD.7010304@cisco.com> <55DC9F86.40002@gih.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20150825225212.585C91A88D3@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/G_n-qNjktqoCo7ScMt8voeCoThs>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] on considering consensus
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:52:13 -0000

At 19:01 25/08/2015, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>how are we going to ever stand as one to defend the 
>multi-stakeholder model of governance?

Any reason why the IETF would defend it? Please quote the consensus or the RFC.
Thx.
jfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email