IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Sat, 08 November 2014 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F8B1A6EE6 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 07:51:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-Is8Trz2W40 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 07:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1BFE1A6EE4 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 07:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [69.38.252.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 325D48A031 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:51:53 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141108155153.GB37292@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <8f3dcda6c3db4cd8be1b77444f987d59@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0805C27.136BE7%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <059f2b06a7b44f09b7568d8966861fb8@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0824FAD.137A42%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <E314302D-5179-4899-9DB7-A3AF18C134E8@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E314302D-5179-4899-9DB7-A3AF18C134E8@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/HuPzEh7lbnzK0yqLgaHyy_jcD-E
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 15:51:58 -0000

On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:37:04AM -0800, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> 
> [BA] Since "IANA .org" affects all the communities, this needs to be handled cooperatively.

Wait, no.  I deny this premise for the purposes of this discussion.

We _already_ have in the draft a term that says "iana.org goes with
the operator."  This is, AIUI, a request for a term that is already in
effect.

What we are talking about is a case where different registries go
their separate ways, and they do so un-co-operatively.  In that case,
_by definition_, iana.org won't affect all communities (or anyway,
can't affect them all in the same way).  

By definition, it can't be handled co-operatively in this case,
because we're already into non-co-operation as part of the scenario
we're trying to cope with.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email