Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 22 January 2015 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8891AC410 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:59:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oj-ehCTRjMgq for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:59:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com (mail-pd0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F28271AC411 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v10so36227726pde.10 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:59:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UoLxlCxFcSO4MAdrNUravtQEFr6wWQklu2ryb602xUA=; b=UsDNs6xLW5CYXLsnvNsejovCS0157Mrt7LTQq3m2lDf5g4TYAVb/1G1vSjRGkeCZxH fMg2hWsJK5eWnTOrXE0QqzThHULleYgifv/oljb2QNg+mDfmVTcatONjQthXPJXjYOOE 65kyxwQpmaBA2RTYGuNkUKu090f+Q3vIoj5XrQddW6vNkp+rzryn0Kh2phFR8Nhs+19r bTE66RvUKgw7fAFt69lXJyeKEhJB7jV8mVmyIovSRvyztrRjjATQCk2pkjJWiHC5lEL4 1EqF+86eqgICxM2M9KtUZHMHgf2geW3Djfpz3yTEdLGhgYSbHrLyzQLal7/Am9qpSnZE jkFg==
X-Received: by 10.66.66.135 with SMTP id f7mr41691408pat.93.1421906385231; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.177.175.85] ([119.17.32.194]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sr4sm7684077pbc.28.2015.01.21.21.59.42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:59:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54C091D2.9050608@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:59:46 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in> <F8FC64C8-6FC7-4672-B18B-46DF993A653A@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <F8FC64C8-6FC7-4672-B18B-46DF993A653A@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/I96--HBa9TZl9px22bFF1uVvQps>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:59:48 -0000

Alissa,

It would be very tedious to have to repeat on the icg forum all the
explanations of how Richard's concern misunderstands the IETF rough
consensus process and ignores this WG's conscious preference not
to address hypothetical future legal issues when we already have IETF
organs chartered to do so. Can we assume the ICG members can see these
explanations without their being repeated?

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 22/01/2015 11:59, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> There have been some follow-up messages:
> 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/index.html
> 
> 
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>; wrote:
> 
>> After draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response was submitted to the ICG, the ICG received the following comment: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ianaplan mailing list
>> Ianaplan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>