IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Mon, 16 February 2015 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04B41A6F15 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:43:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14nNGbeZMifi for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92EC21A6FF1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:43:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w62so30460707wes.9 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:43:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/Ka9z2UqWDxHdzEKEd0VrkHa6VFVTrVdzNXWirlmVHM=; b=0Rz1wUjNR4bU3W1LnnkP8X+2pryekvERdTpWNj9vugyZ+Rjuz69G54N8Z0dt39in1z SLqublXKZdbGvbEQDfkIn2CLt6DwZ+6QVUxQDROyZCt653ub/afPtNEdeqFogdvpy+5m 1RX1hTiUWDDnLiiDeSyUI5IV8RUMaP4w/jECSO27BEkY1qxuEjJZNkp2/VLhy7Fgc/7R iJPrcqhB1WIbMqrzEqbSlwEmUwG14BOr6vR2vpATc/zPYRA1Ae4yIXQSN8OA0aLb4yGX DNYgwtOkBmT8eZglYL6jJo+s0Jl7tQjfDwy8mHDh6KG7L6VFWZmTcOPlPPVyl8qLZVR2 JKyQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.134.68 with SMTP id pi4mr52801196wjb.101.1424108615245; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:43:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.91.8 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:43:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20150216173555.15904.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com> <20150216173555.15904.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:43:15 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dv61TOLKG90gJwkxkyEueHYUuMqz0W62VOBCSvd0kXS-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01175e8922284a050f3820e9
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/IFkZvnFnT78g03-lXbk8Te93354>
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:43:44 -0000

And to me as well.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:35 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> >If there are objections to these points, please let us know by 00h00 UTC
> >on February 19, 2015.
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email