IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Sun, 09 November 2014 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BF31A1B2C for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 08:39:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HR0nEfcWWiMP for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 08:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x235.google.com (mail-qg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA85F1A1B2B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 08:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id z107so4449083qgd.40 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:39:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JqIYJhqznBOaVE5GuLbL38XTke4H3/jm+dKDazmqcQI=; b=aIeaSQ4bjddZEl/peZzEzrI4iVfLfU1yYJ+RX7Jtt74upVMv+OgOsn3emPLQcXCfiy 6mxLV7WUbTo+zCzU79iWKSSuiney+Yakul4C3s0fASlostwHGxW6O/cR9D1PzE05s9/E gx/l0fBH7wVYveP/KdGMYj7n7PP1v8ya/mu1AgwWx1QiXmh0+tJVhwwe3JWvK6TmSbbz 8e33cxoQuMQOUYORSajgXa9MAXcDTOAOYjHN1t//RUQR2rVjOtrUeXPAPXRFI64bK+eS 5o8Si5/xYjQf6dyZ+GVkD7K///PrwFmpJd4IcIWm+2TA1lyZKXwRXDpKdcprGQGMiyZB rVHQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.127.133 with SMTP id g5mr37408092qas.24.1415551148088; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 08:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.87.66 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 08:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.87.66 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 08:39:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <545F955C.5040405@meetinghouse.net>
References: <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <8f3dcda6c3db4cd8be1b77444f987d59@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0805C27.136BE7%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <059f2b06a7b44f09b7568d8966861fb8@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <D0824FAD.137A42%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <E314302D-5179-4899-9DB7-A3AF18C134E8@gmail.com> <20141108155153.GB37292@mx1.yitter.info> <D083864D.138D18%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <A6D94EF5-BD92-4080-8C18-E415BD0BB880@isi.edu> <C78A1523-316F-46A1-9FCE-D0D205679C84@gmail.com> <13B26DE5-315D-453F-B89B-377CCD338ED9@isi.edu> <A7BD5ECF-11E4-42F1-A2B7-BF9B399635C3@gmail.com> <14D42443-53E7-49FA-88DD-7F4BB6BC2DF4@istaff.org> <545F69FB.5000501@meetinghouse.net> <7B719509-5A93-4B85-B7E2-262DDCB64461@istaff.org> <545F955C.5040405@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 17:39:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6i=OisQcQG-v9con0xc6ng4HY+ctzuh+z77RN13iae_ZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2af5c57e36f05076faf73"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/IeyXgr8C6nEbrC7AsNNzul3m4UU
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:39:10 -0000

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 9 Nov 2014 17:25, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
>
> John Curran wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2014, at 3:19 AM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
wrote:
>>>
>
> At the very least, I'd like to see something in our proposal that says
that this is an issue that has to be addressed clearly as part of final
transition arrangements.  I'd personally like to see the IETF lawyers weigh
in and suggest a proposed approach to put forward to the ICG (when flagging
a problem, it's always nice to be able to offer a solution).
>
I did like to add a +1 to this. However I wonder the basis by which IETF
will be making such recommendation[1] especially considering the role it's
playing in this process(being a protocol parameter only community).

Cheers
1. However by the word "recommendation" implies that the ICG could perhaps
decide to mute. Making it a component of the proposal would have been
desirable.

> Miles
>
>
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email