IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 05 November 2014 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B63F1A1AA2 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:53:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPohb1cemDo4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:53:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E5B31A1AA1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 16:53:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2064; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415148809; x=1416358409; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=DNWXJPGXyzy18pAetnZ1qkAv8r1fWt9Vdge0UiTdzUc=; b=YRL4NJfxeWfRfBpDstv51IrHoxGZFBiVUO1K5cv5otA1U5bsy6/RGa+Z jBxi4/czFeh+8bVHHQKE4WDJxx9tsNEu632/gmrLdh85ft/PgGtQsYTPR FW7bq6AX0/clElvdakkrhE0JKRwBXHyWJdFC8csqGj5qzSX5agbaV+wTP o=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,316,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="231024362"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2014 00:53:28 +0000
Received: from [10.155.162.9] ([10.155.162.9]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA50rPIJ003086; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 00:53:26 GMT
Message-ID: <54597504.4020301@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:53:24 -0800
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
References: <6ACE138D-0969-4D8F-9A64-3D1FBB96885A@viagenie.ca> <FC8732DC-BB60-45A2-BF30-0B085CA5FEB9@cooperw.in> <5454B8DE.8040308@cs.tcd.ie> <E5F99046-6C9D-4170-B408-9CA9B7CD6476@gmail.com> <D07CEABF.1357FC%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <40696145-F2EA-428B-911D-60AD5988BE43@cisco.com> <545918F8.40200@cisco.com> <00F4BBBF-E679-405C-90B2-BA02A0862679@cisco.com> <54591ADD.7080300@cisco.com> <3CA17028-BE6F-4668-956E-1618FDB55037@cisco.com> <54593BAA.3090602@cisco.com> <EBE93174-D513-4F10-9D79-ABA20F66CA2A@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <EBE93174-D513-4F10-9D79-ABA20F66CA2A@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="djMum22vGiccEg23lFTXdoOxa3lP2iM3R"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/IwZvmxbryVBhkSrPyZNgUr-ye7w
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:53:31 -0000

On 11/4/14, 1:33 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/4/14, 10:41 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:
>>> Ok, well that sounds like you are saying this draft would be telling
>>> IAOC that they had to do this and that gets back to my "this is not
>>> the hill to die on" 
>> That would be an exaggeration, to say the least.  Our processes don't
>> really provide for other ways forward,
> This isn’t true. I suggested an alternative way, which was to ask the IAOC to get the specified issues resolved to their liking without explicitly requiring the conclusion of a supplemental agreement, which is a very specific constraint on the format and outcome of the IAOC’s negotiations.

Any agreement can be called a supplemental agreement, but if you are not
happy with the word "supplemental" I would be happy to see it gone, but
in any case, I believe you offered wording the other night that
addressed both of our concerns.  I think there is a mild issue with the
language that can be addressed editorially.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email