[Ianaplan] Adrian Farrel's No Objection on charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: (with COMMENT)

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-ianaplan-00-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-ianaplan/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Notwithstanding that "IETF consensus document" normally means "an RFC on
which there has been IETF last call and where there is consensus for
publication" I feel that
   The IANAPLAN working group is chartered to produce an IETF consensus
   document
needs to be clarified since it leave ambiguity as to whether an RFC is
the intended output. there are three options (pick one!)
- "...that will be published as an RFC"
- "...that may be published as an RFC"
- "...that will be produced as an Internet-Draft and submitted to the
ICANN thingy committee when consensus has been reached."

---

In view of Joel's comment about timeliness, I wonder whether
micro-management through the milestones might be helpful.