Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 29 May 2015 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7F21A700D for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzXYkvdI8WJX for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4DB1A6FFC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 12:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BF59A4070; Fri, 29 May 2015 15:58:43 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DKgSn6LMC+4f; Fri, 29 May 2015 15:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417B79A406E; Fri, 29 May 2015 15:58:43 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150529161400.D9E4E1A8A12@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:58:32 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <48D0A927-A1F0-4CB3-BCAC-C47B9188BB66@vigilsec.com>
References: <D15A3C14-F268-4CF1-B942-BAE57B281C58@cooperw.in> <556D3AAA-1655-4785-9395-8F6CD0B73E44@vigilsec.com> <5F8F0771-C77B-4D90-811B-501A4EC79268@istaff.org> <893FE3E3-A2DD-40D8-B39F-1EB24DFE1806@vigilsec.com> <97267ED7-D8A2-4A64-AB74-07434190DD89@piuha.net> <CA+9kkMBZq_U+CC5Jzv5T3pL7qasUHSfv-Gu8q4P36+phABXxzg@mail.gmail.com> <4AB120DC-AFB1-4915-B6C5-7417FB989878@piuha.net> <55669A78.3020309@cisco.com> <C8B9D0E8-C363-4618-8941-D0027B86EB7A@piuha.net> <6BCB4C30-034A-4D13-AD89-88B0719DB75C@vigilsec.com> <20150529161400.D9E4E1A8A12@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/JbPayvOwOcrHVwFo7-CyEK7JsT4>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Time frame inquiry
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 19:58:55 -0000

Jefsey:

> At 17:49 29/05/2015, Russ Housley wrote:
>> Thanks for pulling all of the pieces together.  I t looks good to me.
>> I think it should be signed by the IANAPLAN WG Chairs.  They were the ones that received the letter.
>> Russ
>> 
>> P.S.  Should we put the letter and the response in the liaison system to make them easy to find?
> 
> Dear Russ,
> 
> If you do that you reopen the WG,
> Then I will appeal this decision I strictly oppose for reasons I plan to clarify hopefully today (I was on my first vacations for 15 years last week)
> I certainly agree at least with John Klensin: at this stage we do not know what will happen after we do not know what is proposed to the IETF.
> But I have more reasons. One being called an "ICANN customer" by Lawry what at least calls for clarifications.
> 
> jfc

Please see http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ianaplan/charter/

	State:  Active

Russ