[Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization Consideration and Approval
"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Mon, 15 June 2015 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4621B2E58 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06aRWbNJrxeO for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9678E1B2E59 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [206.123.31.226] (h226.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.226]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A2564044B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:11:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:11:04 -0400
Message-ID: <90E3156B-428B-4A61-92B7-BAC932842FB5@viagenie.ca>
References: <D1A45F80.1B274%grace.abuhamad@icann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/K7V8kam4KTciNflFIkbTBJzfFQE>
Subject: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization Consideration and Approval
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:11:11 -0000
Hello, FYI. (and please read Grace’s caveat below that this document is pending approval). Regards, Marc. Forwarded message: > From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> > To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> > Cc: Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, Izumi > Okutani <izumi@nic.ad.jp>, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani@netnod.se> > Subject: Re: For your Information: CWG-Stewardship Response for > Chartering Organization Consideration and Approval > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:57:34 +0000 > > Hi Marc, > There is no issue for you to forward to your communities. To avoid > confusion, please note that the document is pending approval from the > Chartering Organizations and has not yet been submitted to the ICG. > Also, > I have a link with the Word and PDF versions that may be easier for > some > to access (since the file is quite large for some email and mailing > lists): <https://community.icann.org/x/aJ00Aw> > Best, > Grace > > On 6/15/15, 10:49 AM, "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> > wrote: > >> Hello Grace, >> is there any issue for us to forward your email to our communities? >> >> Regards, Marc. >> >> On 15 Jun 2015, at 10:40, Grace Abuhamad wrote: >> >>> Dear Marc and Leslie, and Izumi and Nurani, >>> On behalf of the CWG-Stewardship Chairs, I¹m forwarding you the >>> final >>> proposal submitted to Chartering Organizations for approval. The >>> goal >>> is to >>> receive approval and submit to the ICG by 25 June. >>> Best, >>> Grace >>> >>> From: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org> >>> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 10:53 AM >>> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, Byron Holland >>> <byron.holland@cira.ca>, "Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch" >>> <Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, Jonathan Robinson >>> <jrobinson@afilias.info>, Patrik Fältström <paf@netnod.se> >>> Cc: Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr@difo.dk>, Theresa Swinehart >>> <theresa.swinehart@icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel >>> <bart.boswinkel@icann.org>, >>> Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, Bernard Turcotte >>> <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> >>> Subject: CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization >>> Consideration >>> and Approval >>> >>> Sent on behalf of CWG-Stewardship Chairs by support staff. >>> >>> To: CWG-Stewardship Chartering SOs and ACs >>> The ALAC, ccNSO, GAC, GNSO, and SSAC >>> >>> Dear SO and AC Chairs, >>> CWG-Stewardship proposed response to the ICG RFP the IANA >>> Stewardship >>> Transition >>> The Cross Community Working Group on Naming Related Functions >>> (CWG-Stewardship) is pleased to provide its Chartering Organizations >>> with >>> its proposed response to the IANA Stewardship Transition >>> Coordination >>> Group >>> (ICG) Request for Proposals on the IANA Stewardship Transition for >>> your >>> consideration and approval as per its Charter. >>> The response is the result of extensive work by the CWG¹s 19 >>> members, >>> 133 >>> participants and a team of highly qualified legal advisors over the >>> past >>> year, which included over 100 calls or meetings, 2 public >>> consultations and >>> more than 4,000 email messages. It represents a carefully crafted >>> balance >>> between key requirements, specific legal advice, and significant >>> compromises >>> by all who participated and includes diligent attention to the input >>> received through the Public Comment proceedings. The final proposal >>> has >>> received the consensus support of the CWG-Stewardship with no >>> objections or >>> minority statements recorded for Chartering Organization >>> consideration. >>> As noted in the CWG-Stewardship proposal itself, the proposal is >>> significantly dependent and expressly conditioned on the >>> implementation of >>> ICANN-level accountability mechanisms proposed by the Cross >>> Community >>> Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability >>> (CCWG-Accountability). >>> The >>> co-chairs of the CWG-Stewardship and the CCWG-Accountability have >>> coordinated their efforts and the CWG-Stewardship is confident that >>> the >>> CCWG-Accountability recommendations, if implemented as expected, >>> will >>> meet >>> the requirements that the CWG-Stewardship has previously >>> communicated >>> to the >>> CCWG. If any element of these ICANN level accountability mechanisms >>> is >>> not >>> implemented as contemplated by the CWG-Stewardship proposal, this >>> proposal >>> will require revision. >>> We also note that there are certain implementation elements that >>> will >>> require further dialogue in the near future, including with the >>> other >>> operational communities, and these have been marked as such in the >>> final >>> proposal. Two specific issues are particularly important to >>> highlight. >>> One >>> is the finalization of the service level expectations (SLEs), where >>> the >>> proposal includes a set of agreed principles between the CWG and >>> IANA, >>> but >>> these remain to be finalized in the form of a mutually agreed set of >>> SLEs. A >>> detailed plan for this finalisation is being worked on and it is our >>> view >>> that this detail, whilst vitally important, does not impact on the >>> substance >>> of the proposal put to you for approval. The second issue entails >>> the >>> location of intellectual property rights and this needs further >>> discussion >>> with the other respondents to the ICG RFP and ICANN. >>> As per the CWG-Stewardship¹s Charter we now seek your approval to >>> submit >>> this final proposal to the ICG and ask you to consider this approval >>> in >>> accordance with your respective SO or AC rules and procedures by 25 >>> June >>> 2015 to meet the overall timing requirements which would allow the >>> transition to proceed, noting that final approval is conditional on >>> the >>> approval of the CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 1 recommendations. >>> >>> >>> >>> We will make ourselves, together with or other key contributors, >>> available >>> to you at the ICANN 53 meeting in Buenos Aires in order to answer >>> any >>> questions you may have and to explain any details of the proposal. >>> For >>> your >>> information, further background documents as well as the slides, >>> recordings >>> and transcripts of recent webinars explain the details of the final >>> proposal >>> are available here: https://community.icann.org/x/sJc0Aw >>> <https://community.icann.org/x/sJc0Aw> . >>> >>> >>> >>> Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to >>> contact us. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Lise Fuhr & Jonathan Robinson >>> >>> Co-Chairs, CWG-Stewardship >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [FinalTransitionProposal_11June.docx]
- [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Steward… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Avri Doria
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Ste… Brian E Carpenter