IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 06 November 2014 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AE11AC3BF for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:21:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0XYzItIgila0 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:21:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFE21AC3BC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:21:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1642; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415312473; x=1416522073; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=hdsSY25Vp0X3JAAcIJpILJ2+fK0sxmkEVf393v2HixE=; b=Zs4itmkLvrpICHJeRN9fD4m2nplKGCqWoVIplri37m57okNV/WgBU/Fk NAovF7L8C2rBKMFP7dowMBV59emmanhl8YOfR3VbMQ9ZFLvHfhR35MDQ2 aQormAeDWRzj6u6nHodFRHKE4ocWsiNvEc3M/E1oKQTvhTbZHOTAmS/rE s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 486
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFAKHzW1StJV2U/2dsb2JhbABbgw6EM897AoEhFgEBAQEBfYQDAQEEI1URCw4KCRYEBwICCQMCAQIBRQYBDAgBAYg9uWeVUgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARqRGIJ3gVQBBIt9iD+BUogIh3eOZII0gWUcgnoBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,328,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="94236058"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2014 22:21:13 +0000
Received: from [10.154.176.81] ([10.154.176.81]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA6MLC9r011332; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:21:12 GMT
Message-ID: <545BF458.2030008@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:21:12 -0800
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <5459BA98.1070006@gmail.com> <545A208A.7040304@meetinghouse.net> <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <545ABCB0.5080206@meetinghouse.net> <20141106021439.GB31797@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20141106021439.GB31797@mx1.yitter.info>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MLbtCcutcDRHalc9g0tghiMulmuNVRXsj"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/M5mqKlviMi_JIIRLgH_kV6dl8FM
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:21:15 -0000

Andrew,

On 11/5/14, 6:14 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> I don't think that there's anything in our current arrangements we
> want to lose. That is what I heard in the IGOVUPDATE and IANAPLAN
> BoFs, and I think that's what the charter says. If you're going to
> negotiate, you have to be prepared to give something up.

How about our agreement on the plan, going forward?  This is a
reasonable request so long as we do not overreach.  We have a convincing
and classic business continuity argument.  I think Alissa's point is
also that we be careful to not overreach. And again, I am happy for the
IAOC to grapple with matter so long as we have clearly stated our
requireements.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email