Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8B11A7113 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZCYsdaRVwra for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B271A710D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1982F9A400D for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:16:38 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEiTnEYVSPm7 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:16:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.196.207.51] (30-193.icannmeeting.org [199.91.193.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900A29A4009 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:16:16 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <82d01c31c6f64af29c90d9d71090925e@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:16:02 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2CC076A5-50D5-4A89-AA5B-F0FF7346CE82@vigilsec.com>
References: <F22D7C95-49EE-4BB9-9ED9-7475736A46C7@cooperw.in> <01870CB5-34E3-450A-910E-5A18D600B27B@piuha.net> <54D8C55F.9070007@dcrocker.net> <20150209144754.GA5582@mx1.yitter.info> <54D8CC7E.7030100@dcrocker.net> <AC790ADC-C4CC-4D8E-B11A-138FF58D6D8D@standardstrack.com> <CFB653FB-B10A-44E4-9E75-8FCD011F7B7C@isoc.org> <54D8E92C.8020706@dcrocker.net> <82d01c31c6f64af29c90d9d71090925e@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/MA4SlQZAcGx1dV7zkIDu5bgBaGc>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:16:50 -0000

Milton:

>>     The IETF is willing to have the IETF Trust hold registration of IANA.ORG, if
>> that is the preference produced from the IANA Stewardship Transition
>> Coordination Group process, if the associated policies and procedures are
>> acceptable to the IETF Trust.
> 
> Um. Don't forget the trademark. 

I have been thinking about this, and I want to share two points.

(1) Whoever hold the IANA Trademark needs to provide explicit permission for it to be used by all parties that have a role with the IABA registries, be it oversight, policy development, or operations.

(2) The IETF Trust is a fine home for the trademark, but any place that provide (1) is okay.

Russ