Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 19 June 2015 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539D61A913E for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yc69yf6i_Bvc for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 119411A9135 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.121] ([131.90.138.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t5JFwuDl019881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:59:00 -0700
Message-ID: <55843C3F.3000208@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:58:55 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <4BE1D2D2-70E9-48F1-939F-92943600D081@cooperw.in> <76A1CE6D-FFC7-4662-828C-732F3BFC67F4@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <76A1CE6D-FFC7-4662-828C-732F3BFC67F4@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/MwdvLlfXlqQbOQWBX4xjTe-Keqo>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: [CWG-Stewardship] ICG request concerning IANA trademark and iana.org domain name
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:59:04 -0000

On 6/19/2015 8:49 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> The CWG transition proposal suggests that "ICANN will grants [sic] PTI
> an exclusive, royalty-free, fully-paid, worldwide license to use the
> IANA trademark and all related trademarks in connection with PTI's
> activities under the ICANN-PTI Contract." [1] Our understanding is that
> this text was not a product of full CWG deliberation and consensus and
> is flagged as subject to further negotiations.


ICANN owns the IANA trademark???

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net