Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization Consideration and Approval

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 20 June 2015 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6220D1ABD36 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Scx2UcOQxuu for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4358F1A9066 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by padev16 with SMTP id ev16so107431745pad.0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K6aFYvgLpkFLBPXtUJqMOC7Oz7RD/FKpzEy8T7nID/U=; b=0LKP3qYAIdWUSEZAd5ZLmbjno4jQuH2ZBzfUfHb8IQhVqjofOc6zJOUq3dXRui+eS9 h+FdgoYLHy/CZ8oP+UnMcv4gpugpMZBMhmKi5nVluvTGSxYZFQTkmOi4QfC3NTs7R9cB UpXt4JxoK8ftQoOaYRaByysLen2J8w6W0UWM6UiFzIjkw98ztMOTeEBG0JkTboM9zMQp Mug/QZNEJfeEhkw0wqw2IyIU7Enrzm6E6xa1GSduxo5J9kDjwMav9LuJ+/Q+a5wxdNE9 AIg+RvWn+aZ+Oy93QqUpzwCsZU+unsps1ueBTNc5sQ5O3pA36VrcN6gcpJc0KJQ4OltH Dhbw==
X-Received: by 10.70.93.69 with SMTP id cs5mr44126164pdb.165.1434833550946; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:79cc:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:79cc:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kh6sm15060332pbc.50.2015.06.20.13.52.28 for <ianaplan@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Jun 2015 13:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5585D28A.4020306@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 08:52:26 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <D1A45F80.1B274%grace.abuhamad@icann.org> <90E3156B-428B-4A61-92B7-BAC932842FB5@viagenie.ca> <557F63E2.40302@gmail.com> <20150619155355.GI17513@mx2.yitter.info> <55847B53.60106@gmail.com> <5584C304.9000806@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <5584C304.9000806@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/NX2OuJQSmspPdbbifS_O1Zte8jg>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Fwd: For your Information: CWG-Stewardship Response for Chartering Organization Consideration and Approval
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:52:32 -0000

On 20/06/2015 13:33, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I do not think there is any notion of the Naming community thinking it
> is more important than the other communities.  It just think that Names
> can only speak for itself. 

To be clear, Avri, my point is about clarity in the document. The phrase "IANA
functions" is intrinsically unclear unless it's qualified as "all IANA functions"
or "IANA naming/numbering/protocol_parameter functions".

Rgds
  Brian