IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Tue, 24 May 2016 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF6C12D14F for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-L0TfzmSoBb for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D755A12B068 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n129so12360432wmn.1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=/ic/PPOu5e44dt5RLjAtO1Maj9JYkcW+mHF1Rsq4YWA=; b=FkO3DFwPrLMbrlePo0i6T4PgfY67tJDjjv7k5W4KxoFkvpG9uOK/eUIFT+4hiINwtu 90nZtqU1pJ9c3F0+2QmsmwouflZf7MS3L8oxmCQyjIiBtyULiebe68b5FpiYTZGDD68l a23Iz7cQDkGoe2hd9jWisxn9Cdy5PMqQrMhvH1f2ke9rs2wWintJn0KvhYuCr9sVTMNx GK0uzBi1m1QLJEiRXxFCIk7bai+caRXEY/EoDg84svdzWM3QaaSo0MFlPzo/nTStVSGL Qw0mgcMXZmUxSxAQ0QtzhAGEZgLMUUUoaubZGReooFfK766Jm0EqX0UmRTMGHAhsuUbb PbcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=/ic/PPOu5e44dt5RLjAtO1Maj9JYkcW+mHF1Rsq4YWA=; b=OgF4Tzh2ywUveVkJW2z/0Merfi5jOAHL23YvpuYV9Ss0eYkA6NI8Wr4dkOIoY8yxrz xnGSO/h2KxvnkOjwh+iFuf4dedcJsiXo0+rdDo+Xuj+6H37YzH6rS03QgSvKjZP8TXIm Dcc4L81KbV7CtOnkbI/F2N+EtDLAlV9xUdFd7lmrMHBo/0ak7br1okQi0BE1C7PL5J0X tDGNElt98pjld9ycRqLo9a8oSy2oMIuSkUXbUkgZpinHdjb5XAhpK0U2vubwsbPPMbTN lErAbK5IHAr+zC2C5bp8tvgaNKYjf+Sba0xSt7rpMdAT7Aq0IJzGqJITuqbgXKH6Dusr pOhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKoB3d4PFEOrTM8Drhi24kpmiIIjNb/61oUlru1+czSVoaSUUbScp6gAdW6MPjChhU8wyD4e8d76o570w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.238.234 with SMTP id vn10mr1308029wjc.127.1464075694111; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.203.42 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.203.42 with HTTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160524004241.54574.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <6a0072fe-1e21-53de-5987-529db82f81fb@gmail.com> <20160524004241.54574.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 08:41:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6iyCNX0ED_oAuwcMsfNEUi1TJYO4hVSBfJHH5LaRepiZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11345698ac063e053391afb0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/O465j_o1XsIiBZe_-kxrUQxNyYs>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] IANA transition and US government budget
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:41:42 -0000

Hi,

Can't seem to get a hold on the url right now but I think NTIA already
contracted an institute to review the submitted proposal and provide
recommendation. There was an amount allocated for that project, so one
wonders where NTIA would make such payment if it's not already budgeted for.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 24 May 2016 1:43 a.m., "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> >> NTIA has to review and approve the transition, otherwise IANA continues
> to operate under contract to the USG or things go into a
> >> really strange limbo.
> >
> >I'm quite sure that a review can be performed without needing a line in
> the budget.
>
> The proposed amendments forbid NTIA to spend any money at all on the
> transition.
>
> US government agencies take this kind of stuff very seriously; when
> the government shuts down while the Congreess is playing budget
> brinkmanship they have to be very careful not to do anything that
> might be considered work.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email