Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG

Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4C81A8871 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:02:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.231
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, MISSING_MID=0.497] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SBxQGIODlQra for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:02:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B27B21A8851 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:02:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 14.218.130.77.rev.sfr.net ([77.130.218.14]:13046 helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1YOXIt-0006Wr-2Q; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:02:31 -0800
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:02:17 +0100
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>,ianaplan@ietf.org
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E63A9E.7030202@gmail.com>
References: <54E214E9.3020103@thinkingcat.com> <54E60949.6050706@thinkingcat.com> <54E61E27.3060504@dcrocker.net> <54E63A9E.7030202@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/BXEQhkLATPCmMwQ1znlGvs-1730>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus Re: Consensus? Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:02:32 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20150219200235.17252.22019.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

At 20:33 19/02/2015, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>IANAL, but the formal beneficiary of the IETF Trust is the IETF. It's for
>the Trust to ask its own counsel whether this matters.
>
>That doesn't affect what this WG says, though

No, Brian. In this case this affects the interest for stability of 
the internet community. The IETF Turst is asked to accept a 
responsibility for all the users. Not to decide anything. I am not 
anymore considering my corporation and its users as bond by IETF 
technical decisions that have to be approved by the NTIA/FCC. 
However, it is of common interest for everyone that e-USA and 
e-Europe, e-Libre, as well as the other e-Global Communities go well 
together (cf. RFC 6852).

My point was only a point of internal consistency of the e-US 
Community, so it does not imballance the other communities. We have 
now to think in terms of our own WG-Draft. The IAB iana.arpa is no 
more the TCP/IP referent. It is for the NTIA/FCC led e-US Community 
the NTIA/FCC approved iana.org operator. I only hope we can manage to 
keep it consistent with its equivalent operators on behalf of the 
other communities.

The global community technology/names/numbers/parameters of the 
network of networks is the new concept affirmed on Jan 8, 2015. It is 
new, but it is fully consistant with the RFC 6852 modern paradigm. 
Howevern I am afraid this has not been made fully plained yet by our 
leaders. Hence my pending appeal.

Best
jfc