IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Thu, 06 November 2014 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575121A8917; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 07:31:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.631
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rH2a_sqt_F1o; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 07:31:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06EE51A890F; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 07:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 183.213.130.77.rev.sfr.net ([77.130.213.183]:61028 helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1XmP1X-00047v-8e; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 07:30:59 -0800
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:30:51 +0100
To: 'Andrew Sullivan' <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, ianaplan@ietf.org
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141106144333.GA33081@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <5459BA98.1070006@gmail.com> <545A208A.7040304@meetinghouse.net> <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <0d10ba336c984561a1a5d6d81db5f26c@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141106144333.GA33081@mx1.yitter.info>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/B9rxbOxPIwfaOgnhVVjJHduEvzU
Cc: iuwg@iuwg.net, gene@iuwg.net, "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:31:02 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20141106153106.7472.82273.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

At 15:43 06/11/2014, 'Andrew Sullivan' wrote:
>Yet you apparently believe that the IETF can extort ICANN, which is 
>what is actually being proposed: they have property, and some are 
>proposing that they have to give it to us without compensation.

Andrew,

All this has actually been addressed by the NTIA (Karen Rose) and 
signed 14 years ago.
Please read my draft version 01. 
http://iuwg.net/images/draft-iuwg-intlnet-sdo-registry-relations.01.pdf.
This is probably where the confusion introduced by Fiona Alexander comes from.

This is BCP 52. The problem is not with ICANN but with the IETF.
- RFC 3172 section 3 should be reminded to participants, WG Chairs, 
RFC authors, ADs
- RFC 3172 Section 5 to the IAB (e.g. Russ Housley Liaison statement 
of 2014/09/15 - https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1351).

Best
jfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email