Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 08 September 2014 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E5D1A0320 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uOTYfMXKm5_Q for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA091A031B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 12:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [50.189.173.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 468078A031 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:02:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:02:23 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140908190223.GM74274@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <540DB003.1060900@cisco.com> <a9927883f15b4da7aa03735b5efeae10@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <a9927883f15b4da7aa03735b5efeae10@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/PHFYS__M3tOl3pDx4Ysu1NDFPl4
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] What are the RIRs doing?
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:02:27 -0000

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 06:58:53PM +0000, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Wonderful. The RIRs have decided what they want _without_ convening an open public process.

Doesn't read that way to me.  When I followed that URI, I got to a page that says this:

> One of the important sessions on the agenda is a 90 minute
> consultation session scheduled for Wednesday, September 17, at 11:00am
> (01:00 UTC) to gather community input on the IANA stewardship
> transition process.
[…]
> In preparation for this session, the APNIC Secretariat has prepared a
> draft proposal (below) containing some points which the IP addressing
> community may want to see represented in a transition plan.

> The proposal aims to stimulate community discussion, so we encourage
> you to study this proposal and provide comments during the session
> next week in Brisbane, and also online, through the discussion mailing
> list.

So I don't think they've decided anything yet.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com