Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CBC1ACDDE for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s_6yWzeku3A9 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7B11ACDCD for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ft15so14285913pdb.11 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:53:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pDs5Ouam0fkekrPQKfYotLsSL1BMnuE/EF8aoxfsOEo=; b=fe5DwAdfGsnupv148X/wSSscZ6wIeHT2RCDCQJNOA99o1qRh2wg9QtbbDPX0AHPn7T 0jt+cX8EV9GYA7CkzjbDSeqDP8rrHegr0BxnZUwtJ4AnpYCvfc3/fpvacYtyz/KPprEx CoVfJlADG5Zx2YqBbw65z85PkUgwUYmeNGvl5IGrM6uG3le5/U/0j7vYHLhUbFSSO0uc EQwgOng7D/EDXYIRwjezFNK3cNyiDmKhwAcXeWMOl11zS+aZ9aWWwmA18+gA8l2k9o1Y 78HUvvzgKSpaEyCoxIKt0dhZ0wvEa5RRY3LoIcOrdEhOxd3nI4ZFOH2NNKVC0QlYod6C Yhrw==
X-Received: by 10.67.30.232 with SMTP id kh8mr677929pad.149.1415130780680; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:53:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (210.199.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.199.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xf9sm1190759pab.2.2014.11.04.11.52.57 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:52:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54592E9B.4060603@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 08:52:59 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
References: <20141103180924.GM27751@mx1.yitter.info> <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNKEMPCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <20141103183007.GP27751@mx1.yitter.info> <B0716AD0-A89C-4C98-B3FB-B7F336AF3DB3@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: <B0716AD0-A89C-4C98-B3FB-B7F336AF3DB3@istaff.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/PeqZLqNDVZQR1jSbUEEpz-KEZD4
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:53:11 -0000

On 05/11/2014 04:03, John Curran wrote:
...
> If the IETF feels that there is a potential issue with respect to the marks 
> and domain name during a stewardship transition from NTIA or with respect to 
> any potential future IANA operator transition, then it should be mentioned 
> in the IETF submission to the ICG.  

If there is an issue, it's the very minor one of having to
switch to a different domain name for certain purposes. IMHO
that is not worth serious concern, but it might be worth
mentioning that there are shared names and marks.

   Brian