Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 09 February 2015 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8C11A1BC5 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:07:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4i8KbmZrHlE for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBCA51A1BCE for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.28.149] (rrcs-67-52-140-5.west.biz.rr.com [67.52.140.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t19H6srA014042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:06:57 -0800
Message-ID: <54D8E92C.8020706@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:06:52 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <F22D7C95-49EE-4BB9-9ED9-7475736A46C7@cooperw.in> <01870CB5-34E3-450A-910E-5A18D600B27B@piuha.net> <54D8C55F.9070007@dcrocker.net> <20150209144754.GA5582@mx1.yitter.info> <54D8CC7E.7030100@dcrocker.net> <AC790ADC-C4CC-4D8E-B11A-138FF58D6D8D@standardstrack.com> <CFB653FB-B10A-44E4-9E75-8FCD011F7B7C@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CFB653FB-B10A-44E4-9E75-8FCD011F7B7C@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/RDbUj1CIlQFc08O1IoeytPDyDso>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:07:04 -0000

On 2/9/2015 9:01 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote:
> With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a particular IANA Numbering Services Operator. 
> 
> The IETF Trust would be an acceptable candidate for holding the trademark and domain.


Those look like a useful preface to the text that I suggested.  The
result is a reasonable sequence:


     With regards to the IANA trademark and the IANA.ORG domain, both
are associated with the IANA Numbering Services and not with a
particular IANA Numbering Services Operator.

     The IETF Trust would be an acceptable candidate for holding the
trademark and domain.

     The IETF is willing to have the IETF Trust hold registration of
IANA.ORG, if that is the preference produced from the IANA Stewardship
Transition Coordination Group process, if the associated policies and
procedures are acceptable to the IETF Trust.



d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net