Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 07 November 2014 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F7F1A0045 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:37:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ei0pEjRv_487 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B1071A0035 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kx10so4427180pab.6 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:37:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=gAcpzf75nddBHzJbrC46bhYZqR+NPopbjXP8vZ0Ixt8=; b=KjwCaDcqNVLdBshr/cRipeTIvqtu99SlwfifyTpobG6bEzlyX5TeHnF1xkROeZZNeO Lar20i+bt7buJaWG/msggNrS83VEfpUT4jXrMMRCIAauzaKqKO4FPKqM8lWs2a/FY0qt WNi42JBpizqCmK0DJHy18KH+Ngny6d4OpJcle53wx50EvP+/RUVA3Yk6n0FjZfjS8CnA 6wtibbdATBoBECdPKvkCuDilWokvV+wrAo6BtuUwDL0Migh0CdqAThKK2FuLlNealHyR ApMK++IGrDwnl2wY8p+qOiNYhvSQcu9eYPmwcrREbDt+3/H1ZMd0ITHG8vqXm3adflLQ IEig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmB6EhSLNWhyUQ0ocjzDJ0ARSPLawcyw8dv+Yd5tRrrNrPJXhYchT2n2TYREOqW7cmg8vza
X-Received: by 10.70.87.168 with SMTP id az8mr15721499pdb.55.1415403454092; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316? ([2605:e000:1102:4026:4599:84cc:4f94:a316]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dl1sm9793988pbc.16.2014.11.07.15.37.32 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:37:33 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BAF9A040-DB0D-45F5-B6C6-9C895412D218"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <9f063a26cf6b4975939999887dfca086@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:37:30 -1000
Message-Id: <1F64606E-1CB8-47EC-BFA9-5654A26B1BE1@virtualized.org>
References: <54594A50.4090305@meetinghouse.net> <20141105001731.GA30186@mx1.yitter.info> <54597BDB.7040305@meetinghouse.net> <5459BA98.1070006@gmail.com> <545A208A.7040304@meetinghouse.net> <631e3e3d29c843bd9c23151c63612989@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105154903.GI30379@mx1.yitter.info> <498a39b81b774192bd2d609b3feab35f@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141105234444.GM31320@crankycanuck.ca> <0d10ba336c984561a1a5d6d81db5f26c@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20141106144333.GA33081@mx1.yitter.info> <6e19bf2618a54b27bb1b859842e98144@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <89E194B2-726A-440F-814D-8BC91D8C82D3@virtualized.org> <9f063a26cf6b4975939999887dfca086@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/RsPUab4KbRtA62DFSthg5rNzWpk
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 23:37:35 -0000

Milton,

On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
> The board liaison and the IANA rep are on the ICG for informational purposes, which means they are not supposed to be voting on whatever we vote on, nor are they supposed to be advocating their or the board's opinion. 

I sense a bit of a disconnect in translating the role you describe above into:

"ICANN itself was fully represented in the development of the proposal and had the ability to publicly comment on it."

(other than in the "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others" sense of course)

Regards,
-drc
(ICANN CTO, but speaking only for myself. Really.)