IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 24 August 2015 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B593D1A8820 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JYeV3H139KEA for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F271A87BF for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB21BF27; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:29:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RbombAbsrLAG; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:29:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39664BF18; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:29:12 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1440433752; bh=K3pnhwyjKXsTSjhdbzeHUWgfnBFnpV9K1gebWCJcje8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mut3rkX+w4DINXxOJNJEamiO6qtXRnggGX/ALZWLt2KogdKE2BdNzy0INj3IkwSdD D+KUKuy6mYVuW3O9f+O9fSbIWIKZ7lLiyInBjOrbbX2mpyarHtyUaVHKRMF2XTIvAF HI0RQUsGhH5N7HQr2gmF83GnsE9wqXiSkTSKcnIU=
Message-ID: <55DB4657.9030708@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:29:11 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat)" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
References: <3A072B1E-FE4C-476E-B6F8-0309F377D221@thinkingcat.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A072B1E-FE4C-476E-B6F8-0309F377D221@thinkingcat.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/SbnavMxF3HhIz-WgbiZVGTRAOYM>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Updated text Re: Please keep context in mind Re: Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:29:15 -0000

I'm fine with this version. (It's better than the original, thanks.)

S

On 24/08/15 17:22, Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Bearing in mind the context below, it seems to us that the text
> currently under discussion for consensus (with thanks to Brian and
> Richard, all) is:
> 
> “The IETF IANAPLAN working group supports the draft ICG proposal going
> forward, as far as the Protocol Parameters function is concerned.  The
> IETF raised two transition points that are mentioned in Paragraph 3062
> of the proposal.  We would ask that they be referenced in Part 0,
> Section V of the proposal as well.”
> 
> Assuming no further objection/amendment, that is the text we will call
> on Friday.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Leslie&Marc.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email